HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by de Koning, Jos. J. Articles by Bobbert, M. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by de Koning, Jos. J. Articles by Bobbert, M. F.

Experimental evaluation of the power balance model of speed skating

¹Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and ²Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse, LaCrosse, Wisconsin

Submitted 8 October 2003 ; accepted in final form 17 June 2004

Prediction of speed skating performance with a power balance model requires assumptions about the kinetics of energy production, skating efficiency, and skating technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these parameters during competitive imitations for the purpose of improving model predictions. Elite speed skaters (n = 8) performed races and submaximal efficiency tests. External power output (P_o) was calculated from movement analysis and aerodynamic models and ice friction measurements. Aerobic kinetics was calculated from breath-by-breath oxygen uptake (O₂). Aerobic power (P_aer) was calculated from measured skating efficiency. Anaerobic power (P_an) kinetics was determined by subtracting P_aer from P_o. We found gross skating efficiency to be 15.8% (1.8%). In the 1,500-m event, the kinetics of P_an was characterized by a first-order system as P_an = 88 + 556e^–0.0494t (in W, where t is time). The rate constant for the increase in P_aer was –0.153 s^–1, the time delay was 8.7 s, and the peak P_aer was 234 W; P_aer was equal to 234[1 – e^{–0.153(t–8.7)}] (in W). Skating position changed with preextension knee angle increasing and trunk angle decreasing throughout the event. We concluded the pattern of P_aer to be quite similar to that reported during other competitive imitations, with the exception that the increase in P_aer was more rapid. The pattern of P_an does not appear to fit an "all-out" pattern, with near zero values during the last portion of the event, as assumed in our previous model (De Koning JJ, de Groot G, and van Ingen Schenau GJ. J Biomech 25: 573–580, 1992). Skating position changed in ways different from those assumed in our previous model. In addition to allowing improved predictions, the results demonstrate the importance of observations in unique subjects to the process of model construction.

sport performance; modeling; muscular power output; aerobic power; anaerobic power

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C Foster, K J Hendrickson, K Peyer, B Reiner, J J deKoning, A Lucia, R A Battista, F J Hettinga, J P Porcari, and G Wright Pattern of developing the performance template Br. J. Sports Med., September 15, 2009; 43(10): 765 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Tucker and T D Noakes The physiological regulation of pacing strategy during exercise: a critical review Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2009; 43(6): e1 - e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]