Journal of Applied Physiology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 97: 2395-2397, 2004; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00705.2004
8750-7587/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silber, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Colan, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silber, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Colan, S. D.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

The following is the abstract of the article discussed in the subsequent letter:

ABSTRACT

Wall stress, although commonly used as an index of afterload, fails to take into account forces generated within the wall of the left ventricle (LV) that oppose systolic fiber shortening. Wall stress may, therefore, misrepresent fiber stress, the force resisting fiber shortening, particularly in the presence of an abnormal LV thickness-to-dimension ratio (h/D). M-mode LV echocardiograms were obtained from 207 patients with a wide range of values for LV mass and/or h/D. Diagnoses were valvar aortic stenosis, coarctation repair, anthracycline treated, and severe aortic and/or mitral regurgitation. End-systolic wall stress (WSes) and fiber stress (FSes) were expressed as age-corrected Z scores relative to a normal population. The difference between WSes and FSes was extreme when h/D was elevated or reduced [WSes Z score – FSes Z score = 0.14 x (h/D)–1.47 – 2.13; r = 0.78, P < 0.001], with WSes underestimating FSes when h/D was increased and overestimating FSes when h/D was decreased. Analyses of myocardial mechanics based on wall stress have limited validity in patients with abnormal ventricular geometry.


 

REPLY

Thomas L. Gentles

Department of Pediatrics
University of Auckland and Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Service
Starship Children’s Hospital
1001 Auckland, New Zealand
E-mail: TomG{at}adhb.govt.nz

Steven D. Colan

Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital and Department of Pediatrics
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts 02115





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. M. Hudson, S. N. Rai, C. Nunez, T. E. Merchant, N. M. Marina, N. Zalamea, C. Cox, S. Phipps, R. Pompeu, and D. Rosenthal
Noninvasive Evaluation of Late Anthracycline Cardiac Toxicity in Childhood Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3635 - 3643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.