|
|
||||||||
INVITED EDITORIAL
1James Hogg iCAPTURE Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; 2Departments of Medicine, Molecular Physiology, and Biophysics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont; 3Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; 4Pulmonary Section, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; 5Division of Pediatric Pulmonary Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; 6Physiology Program, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; 7Zentralinstitut fur Biomedizinische Technik, Erlangen, Germany; 8Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; 9Department of Pharmacolgy, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada; 10Department of Cellular & Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; 11Department of Molecular, Pharmacology, Physiology and Biotechnology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; 12Department of Physiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; 13Department of Asthma, Allergy, and Respiratory Science, The Guy's, King's College & St. Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; 14West Australia Sleep Disorder Research Institute, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedland, Australia; 15Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 16Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota; 17The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, St. Leonards, Australia; 18Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois; 19Institute of Fundamental Sciences-Physics, Palmerston North, New Zealand; 20Department of Medicine, McGill University, Meakins-Christie Laboratories, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 21Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; 22School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; 23Physiology M311, School of Biomedical and Chemical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia; 24Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins University Blomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; 25Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; 26Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and 27Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
ABSTRACT
The observation that the length-force relationship in airway smooth muscle can be shifted along the length axis by accommodating the muscle at different lengths has stimulated great interest. In light of the recent understanding of the dynamic nature of length-force relationship, many of our concepts regarding smooth muscle mechanical properties, including the notion that the muscle possesses a unique optimal length that correlates to maximal force generation, are likely to be incorrect. To facilitate accurate and efficient communication among scientists interested in the function of airway smooth muscle, a revised and collectively accepted nomenclature describing the adaptive and dynamic nature of the length-force relationship will be invaluable. Setting aside the issue of underlying mechanism, the purpose of this article is to define terminology that will aid investigators in describing observed phenomena. In particular, we recommend that the term "optimal length" (or any other term implying a unique length that correlates with maximal force generation) for airway smooth muscle be avoided. Instead, the in situ length or an arbitrary but clearly defined reference length should be used. We propose the usage of "length adaptation" to describe the phenomenon whereby the length-force curve of a muscle shifts along the length axis due to accommodation of the muscle at different lengths. We also discuss frequently used terms that do not have commonly accepted definitions that should be used cautiously.
smooth muscle contraction; adaptation; plasticity; cytoskeleton; contractile apparatus
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Speich, A. M. Almasri, H. Bhatia, A. P. Klausner, and P. H. Ratz Adaptation of the length-active tension relationship in rabbit detrusor Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2009; 297(4): F1119 - F1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Tang and Y. Anfinogenova Physiologic Properties and Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton in Vascular Smooth Muscle Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, June 1, 2008; 13(2): 130 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Tadie, P. Henno, I. Leroy, C. Danel, E. Naline, C. Faisy, M. Riquet, M. Levy, D. Israel-Biet, and C. Delclaux Role of nitric oxide synthase/arginase balance in bronchial reactivity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): L489 - L497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Rembold, A. D. Tejani, M. L. Ripley, and S. Han Paxillin phosphorylation, actin polymerization, noise temperature, and the sustained phase of swine carotid artery contraction Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): C993 - C1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Eddinger and D. P. Meer Myosin II isoforms in smooth muscle: heterogeneity and function Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): C493 - C508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. An, T. R. Bai, J. H. T. Bates, J. L. Black, R. H. Brown, V. Brusasco, P. Chitano, L. Deng, M. Dowell, D. H. Eidelman, et al. Airway smooth muscle dynamics: a common pathway of airway obstruction in asthma Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 834 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Speich, C. Dosier, L. Borgsmiller, K. Quintero, H. P. Koo, and P. H. Ratz Adjustable passive length-tension curve in rabbit detrusor smooth muscle J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 1746 - 1755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Smolensky and L. E. Ford The extensive length-force relationship of porcine airway smooth muscle J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 1906 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ito, A. Majumdar, H. Kume, K. Shimokata, K. Naruse, K. R. Lutchen, D. Stamenovic, and B. Suki Viscoelastic and dynamic nonlinear properties of airway smooth muscle tissue: roles of mechanical force and the cytoskeleton Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): L1227 - L1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. P. Silveira, J. P. Butler, and J. J. Fredberg Length adaptation of airway smooth muscle: a stochastic model of cytoskeletal dynamics J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2087 - 2098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, P. Chitano, and T. M. Murphy Length oscillation induces force potentiation in infant guinea pig airway smooth muscle Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): L909 - L915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. McParland, R. R. Tait, P. D. Pare, and C. Y. Seow The Role of Airway Smooth Muscle during an Attack of Asthma Simulated In Vitro Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2005; 33(5): 500 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |