HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Larson, M. D. Articles by Sessler, D. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Larson, M. D. Articles by Sessler, D. I.

TRANSLATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY

Latency of pupillary reflex dilation during general anesthesia

¹Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0648; ²Department of Anesthesia, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia; and ³Outcomes Research Institute and Department of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202

Submitted 2 February 2004 ; accepted in final form 24 March 2004

Areas of insensibility produced by neuraxial anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks can be detected during general anesthesia by failure of noxious stimulation to trigger pupillary reflex dilation. We examined the latency of pupillary reflex dilation and the effect of fentanyl on the latency of reflex dilation during anesthesia in nine volunteers. We hypothesized that the reflex was generated by slowly conducting C nociceptive fibers and would be significantly delayed if a distal dermatome (L₄) was stimulated compared with a proximal dermatome (C₅). We also hypothesized that fentanyl would prolong the latency and alter the shape of the reflex. After induction of general anesthesia, pupillary reflex dilation was measured with an infrared pupillometer every 5 min after stimulations of the L₄ and C₅ dermatomes. Fentanyl (3 µg/kg) was then given intravenously. Pupillary reflex dilation latencies were calculated by examining each individual measurement. After 3 h, naloxone (400 µg) was given intravenously; anesthesia was then discontinued. Pupillary reflex dilation had a long latency and consisted of distinct early and late phases. No differences were found between latencies of reflex dilation after simulation of L₄ and C₅ dermatomes either before or after fentanyl administration. Fentanyl at high concentrations essentially eliminated pupillary reflex dilation; but over the 180-min observation period, first early and then late dilation returned. Fentanyl produced a small increase in the latency of the initial early dilation. We conclude that pupillary reflex dilation during anesthesia is not initiated by slowly conducting C fibers and that fentanyl depresses the reflex in a stereotypical manner.

nociception; windup; pupil; opioids; sensory block

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Larson, P. D. Berry, J. May, A. Bjorksten, and D. I. Sessler Autonomic effects of epidural and intravenous fentanyl Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2007; 98(2): 263 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]