HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 96/2/731    most recent 00511.2003v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DePalo, V. A. Articles by McCool, F. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DePalo, V. A. Articles by McCool, F. D.

Respiratory muscle strength training with nonrespiratory maneuvers

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island/Brown University School of Medicine, Pawtucket, Rhode Island 02860

Submitted 14 May 2003 ; accepted in final form 17 September 2003

The diaphragm and abdominal muscles can be recruited during nonrespiratory maneuvers. With these maneuvers, transdiaphragmatic pressures are elevated to levels that could potentially provide a strength-training stimulus. To determine whether repeated forceful nonrespiratory maneuvers strengthen the diaphragm, four healthy subjects performed sit-ups and biceps curls 3-4 days/wk for 16 wk and four subjects served as controls. The maximal transdiaphragmatic pressure was measured at baseline and after 16 wk of training. Maximum static inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures and diaphragm thickness derived from ultrasound were measured at baseline and 8 and 16 wk. After training, there were significant increases in diaphragm thickness [2.5 ± 0.1 to 3.2 ± 0.1 mm (mean ± SD) (P < 0.001)], maximal transdiaphragmatic pressure [198 ± 21 to 256 ± 23 cmH₂O (P < 0.02)], maximum static inspiratory pressure [134 ± 22 to 171 ± 16 cmH₂O (P < 0.002)], maximum static expiratory pressure [195 ± 20 to 267 ± 40 cmH₂O (P < 0.002)], and maximum gastric pressure [161 ± 5 to 212 ± 40 cmH₂O (P < 0.03)]. These parameters were unchanged in the control group. We conclude that nonrespiratory maneuvers can strengthen the inspiratory and expiratory muscles in healthy individuals. Because diaphragm thickness increased with training, the increase in maximal pressures is unlikely due to a learning effect.

transdiaphragmatic pressure; diaphragm ultrasound; weight lifting

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. D. McCool and M. J. Rosen Nonpharmacologic Airway Clearance Therapies: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1_suppl): 250S - 259S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]