HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 95/4/1338    most recent 00132.2003v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crabbe, J. C. Articles by Wahlsten, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crabbe, J. C. Articles by Wahlsten, D.

MOUSE PHENOME PROJECT

Genotypic differences in ethanol sensitivity in two tests of motor incoordination

¹Portland Alcohol Research Center, Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97239; and ²Department of Psychology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9

Submitted 7 February 2003 ; accepted in final form 16 April 2003

ABSTRACT

Motor incoordination is frequently used as a behavioral index of intoxication by drugs that depress the central nervous system. Two tasks that have been used to assay incoordination in mice, the balance beam and the grid test, were evaluated to optimize aspects of apparatus and testing procedures for studying genetic differences. Mice of eight inbred strains were given one of several doses of ethanol or saline and tested for intoxication. Strains differed in sensitivity to ethanol in both tests, indicating a significant influence of genotype on ethanol sensitivity. For the balance beam, the width of the beam affected the strain sensitivity pattern, and only the widest beam worked well at all doses. For the grid test, both ethanol dose and the time after drug injection affected strains differentially. Although the behavioral sign of intoxication recorded for both tests was a foot-slip error, the correlations of strain means for ethanol sensitivity across the two tasks were generally not significant. This suggests that the genes influencing ethanol sensitivity in the two tasks are mostly different. These results make clear that a single set of task parameters is insufficient to characterize genetic influences on behavior. Several other issues affect the interpretation of data using these tests.

inbred mouse strains; pharmacogenetics; ataxia; grid test; balance beam

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. E. Letwin, N. Kafkafi, Y. Benjamini, C. Mayo, B. C. Frank, T. Luu, N. H. Lee, and G. I. Elmer Combined application of behavior genetics and microarray analysis to identify regional expression themes and gene-behavior associations. J. Neurosci., May 17, 2006; 26(20): 5277 - 5287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Maas Jr, S. K. Vogt, G. C. K. Chan, V. V. Pineda, D. R. Storm, and L. J. Muglia Calcium-Stimulated Adenylyl Cyclases Are Critical Modulators of Neuronal Ethanol Sensitivity J. Neurosci., April 20, 2005; 25(16): 4118 - 4126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Metten, K. L. Best, A. J. Cameron, A. B. Saultz, J. M. Zuraw, C.-H. Yu, D. Wahlsten, and J. C. Crabbe Observer-rated ataxia: rating scales for assessment of genetic differences in ethanol-induced intoxication in mice J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2004; 97(1): 360 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bogue Mouse Phenome Project: understanding human biology through mouse genetics and genomics J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2003; 95(4): 1335 - 1337. [Full Text] [PDF]