HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 95/2/511    most recent 01114.2002v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Black, L. D. Articles by Lutchen, K. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Black, L. D. Articles by Lutchen, K. R.

Tracking variations in airway caliber by using total respiratory vs. airway resistance in healthy and asthmatic subjects

¹Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 02135; ⁴Pulmonary Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02115; ²Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, and ³Centro di Bioingegneria, Fondazione Don Gnocchi Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico and Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy

Submitted 4 December 2002 ; accepted in final form 5 April 2003

An index of airway caliber can be tracked in near-real time by measuring airway resistance (Raw) as indicated by lung resistance at 8 Hz. These measurements require the placing of an esophageal balloon. The objective of this study was to establish whether total respiratory system resistance (Rrs) could be used rather than Raw to track airway caliber, thereby not requiring an esophageal balloon. Rrs includes the resistance of the chest wall (Rcw). We used a recursive least squares approach to track Raw and Rrs at 8 Hz in seven healthy and seven asthmatic subjects during tidal breathing and a deep inspiration (DI). In both subject groups, Rrs was significantly higher than Raw during tidal breathing at baseline and postchallenge. However, at total lung capacity, Raw and Rrs became equivalent. Measured with this approach, Rcw appears volume dependent, having a magnitude of 0.5–1.0 cmH₂O · l^-1 · s during tidal breathing and decreasing to zero at total lung capacity. When resistances are converted to an effective diameter, Rrs data overestimate the increase in diameter during a DI. Simulation studies suggest that the decrease in apparent Rcw during a DI is a consequence of airway opening flow underestimating chest wall flow at increased lung volume. We conclude that the volume dependence of Rcw can bias the presumed net change in airway caliber during tidal breathing and a DI but would not distort assessment of maximum airway dilation.

chest wall resistance; airway hypereactivity; asthma

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Kaczka, R. H. Brown, and W. Mitzner Assessment of heterogeneous airway constriction in dogs: a structure-function analysis J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 520 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Slats, K. Janssen, R. C. de Jeu, D. T. van der Plas, R. Schot, J. G. van den Aardweg, and P. J. Sterk Enhanced airway dilation by positive-pressure inflation of the lungs compared with active deep inspiration in patients with asthma J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1725 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Kaminsky, C. G. Irvin, L. K. A. Lundblad, J. Thompson-Figueroa, J. Klein, M. J. Sullivan, F. Flynn, S. Lang, L. Bourassa, S. Burns, et al. Heterogeneity of bronchoconstriction does not distinguish mild asthmatic subjects from healthy controls when supine J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2008; 104(1): 10 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Brown, C. M. Salome, N. Berend, C. W. Thorpe, and G. G. King Airway Distensibility in Adults with Asthma and Healthy Adults, Measured by Forced Oscillation Technique Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2007; 176(2): 129 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Affonce and K. R. Lutchen New perspectives on the mechanical basis for airway hyperreactivity and airway hypersensitivity in asthma J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1710 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Delclaux, F. Zerah-Lancner, B. Mahut, S. Ribeil, A. Dubois, C. Larger, and A. Harf Alveolar Nitric Oxide and Effect of Deep Inspiration During Methacholine Challenge Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1696 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Tepper, R. Ramchandani, E. Argay, L. Zhang, Z. Xue, Y. Liu, and S. J. Gunst Chronic strain alters the passive and contractile properties of rabbit airways J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2005; 98(5): 1949 - 1954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Watson and N. B. Pride Postural changes in lung volumes and respiratory resistance in subjects with obesity J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2005; 98(2): 512 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wagers, L. K. A. Lundblad, M. Ekman, C. G. Irvin, and J. H. T. Bates The allergic mouse model of asthma: normal smooth muscle in an abnormal lung? J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2004; 96(6): 2019 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Hantos, R. A. Collins, D. J. Turner, T. Z. Janosi, and P. D. Sly Tracking of airway and tissue mechanics during TLC maneuvers in mice J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2003; 95(4): 1695 - 1705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]