Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 94: 1841-1848, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00912.2002
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheuvront, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sawka, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheuvront, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sawka, M. N.
Vol. 94, Issue 5, 1841-1848, May 2003

Efficacy of intermittent, regional microclimate cooling

Samuel N. Cheuvront, Margaret A. Kolka, Bruce S. Cadarette, Scott J. Montain, and Michael N. Sawka

United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-5007

The vasomotor response to cold may compromise the capacity for microclimate cooling (MCC) to reduce thermoregulatory strain. This study examined the hypothesis that intermittent, regional MCC (IRC) would abate this response and improve heat loss when compared with constant MCC (CC) during exercise heat stress. In addition, the relative effectiveness of four different IRC regimens was compared. Five heat-acclimated men attempted six experimental trials of treadmill walking (~225 W/m2) in a warm climate (dry bulb temperature = 30°C, dewpoint temperature = 11°C) while wearing chemical protective clothing (insulation = 2.1; moisture permeability = 0.32) with a water-perfused (21°C) cooling undergarment. The six trials conducted were CC (continuous perfusion) of 72% body surface area (BSA), two IRC regimens cooling 36% BSA by using 2:2 (IRC1) or 4:4 (IRC2) min on-off perfusion ratios, two IRC regimens cooling 18% BSA by using 1:3 (IRC3) or 2:6 (IRC4) min on-off perfusion ratios, and a no cooling (NC) control. Compared with NC, CC significantly reduced changes in rectal temperature (~1.2°C) and heart rate (~60 beats/min) (P < 0.05). The four IRC regimens all provided a similar reduction in exercise heat strain and were 164-215% more efficient than CC because of greater heat flux over a smaller BSA. These findings indicate that the IRC approach to MCC is a more efficient means of cooling when compared with CC paradigms and can improve MCC capacity by reducing power requirements.

exercise heat strain; heat balance; protective clothing; thermoregulation; skin temperature


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
C. R. Vernieuw, L. A. Stephenson, and M. A. Kolka
Thermal Comfort and Sensation in Men Wearing a Cooling System Controlled by Skin Temperature
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, December 1, 2007; 49(6): 1033 - 1044.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
H. Cao, D. H. Branson, S. Peksoz, J. Nam, and C. A. Farr
Fabric Selection for a Liquid Cooling Garment
Textile Research Journal, July 1, 2006; 76(7): 587 - 595.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online