Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 94: 604-611, 2003. First published October 18, 2002; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00568.2002
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/604    most recent
00568.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paciej, R.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paciej, R.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R.
Vol. 94, Issue 2, 604-611, February 2003

Transpulmonary speed of sound input into the supraclavicular space

R. Paciej, A. Vyshedskiy, J. Shane, and R. Murphy

Faulkner/Brigham and Women's Hospitals, Boston, Massachusetts 02130

The transpulmonary speed of sound input at the mouth has been shown to vary with lung volume. To avoid the disadvantages that exist in certain clinical situations in inputting sound at the mouth, we input sound in the supraclavicular space of 21 healthy volunteers to determine whether similar information on the relationship of sound speed to lung volume could be obtained. We measured the transit time at multiple microphones placed over the chest wall using a 16-channel lung sound analyzer (Stethographics). There was a tight distribution of transit times in this population of subjects. At functional residual capacity, it was 9 ± 1 (SD) ms at the apical sites and 13 ± 1 ms at the lung bases. The sound speed at total lung capacity was 24 ± 2 m/s and was 22 ± 2 m/s at residual volume (P < 0.001). In all subjects, the speed of sound was faster at higher lung volume. This improved method of studying the mechanism of sound transmission in the lung may help in the development of noninvasive tools for diagnosis and monitoring of lung diseases.

sound speed; lung parenchyma; sound recording; lung sound; noninvasive


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. J. Berger, E. M. Skuza, C. A. Ramsden, and M. H. Wilkinson
Velocity and attenuation of sound in the isolated fetal lung as it is expanded with air
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2235 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online