Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 93: 1723-1730, 2002; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00326.2002
8750-7587/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontana, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pistolesi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fontana, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pistolesi, M.
Vol. 93, Issue 5, 1723-1730, November 2002

Handgrip-induced airway dilation in asthmatic patients with bronchoconstriction induced by MCh inhalation

Giovanni A. Fontana1, Tito Pantaleo2, Federico Lavorini1, Fulvia Bongianni2, Massimo Mannelli3, Peter D. Bridge4, and Massimo Pistolesi1

Dipartimento di 1 Area Critica Medico Chirurgica, 2 Scienze Fisiologiche, and 3 Fisiopatologia Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, I-50134 Florence, Italy; and 4 Department of Respiratory Paediatrics, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, United Kingdom

We investigated the effects of static and rhythmic handgrip on the time course of recovery of airway resistance measured with the interrupter technique (Rint) following bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine (MCh) inhalation in 17 asthmatic patients. On three separate occasions, a 100 ± 5% increase in baseline Rint was induced by MCh inhalation. Subsequently, patients either rested [control trials (CTs)] or performed 3-min bouts of static or rhythmic handgrip. Respiratory and cardiovascular variables were continuously monitored. Rint changes were assessed at 1-min intervals for 30 min after rest and both types of handgrip. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were also determined at scheduled intervals. Bronchoconstriction increased ventilation (P < 0.01) but did not affect cardiovascular variables and plasma catecholamine concentrations. Handgrip provoked an increase in cardiovascular variables (P < 0.01) and plasma norepinephrine concentrations (P < 0.05) but caused no additional changes in ventilation. Rint only partially recovered within 30 min after CTs, whereas it consistently decreased 1 min after both handgrip paradigms and remained lower than after CTs (P always <0.01) for the whole 30-min observation period. Sympathetic activation and withdrawal of cholinergic input to the airway smooth muscle reflexly induced by activation of skeletal muscle and carotid sinus receptors may be the primary events accounting for the bronchodilator response induced by handgrip. Mediators co-released in response to sympathetic activation may also have contributed.

interrupter technique; pattern of breathing; exercise


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. J. Oh, S. B. Mazzone, B. J. Canning, and D. Weinreich
Reflex regulation of airway sympathetic nerves in guinea-pigs
J. Physiol., June 1, 2006; 573(2): 549 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online