Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 93: 1275-1279, 2002; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00336.2002
8750-7587/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elabbassi, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Libert, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elabbassi, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Libert, J.-P.
Vol. 93, Issue 4, 1275-1279, October 2002

Influence of head position on thermal stress in newborns: simulation using a thermal mannequin

Elmountacer Billah Elabbassi, Karen Chardon, Frédéric Telliez, Véronique Bach, and Jean-Pierre Libert

Environnement Toxique Périnatal et Adaptations Physiologiques et Comportementales, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, F-80036 Amiens Cédex, France

The influence of head position on thermal stress was assessed by using a heavily clothed thermal mannequin in three different body positions [supine, face straight up (FSU); supine, face to the side (FTS); prone, FTS] and with or without the head covered by a bonnet. The mannequin was exposed to air temperatures of 29, 32, 34, and 36°C. When the head is uncovered, body or head position has no impact on heat loss. When the head is covered, dry heat loss from the mannequin as a whole (and that from the head in particular) is lower (-0.35 to -0.40 W) in the FTS position than in the FSU position as a result of decreased heat loss from the surface area of the face in contact with the mattress. In the FTS position and with the head covered, there was no difference in heat loss between the prone and supine positions. The results suggest that in heavily clothed newborns whose head is covered by a bonnet, thermal stress depends on the head position.

heat stress; clothing insulation; body position





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online