Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 92: 1619-1627, 2002; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00732.2001
8750-7587/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choukèr, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thiel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choukèr, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thiel, M.
Vol. 92, Issue 4, 1619-1627, April 2002

Effects of confinement (110 and 240 days) on neuroendocrine stress response and changes of immune cells in men

A. Choukèr1, L. Smith1, F. Christ1, I. Larina2, I. Nichiporuk2, V. Baranov2, E. Bobrovnik2, L. Pastushkova2, K. Messmer3, K. Peter1, and M. Thiel1

1 Clinic of Anaesthesiology and 3 Institute for Surgical Research, University of Munich, 81366 Munich, Germany; and 2 Institute of Biomedical Problems, 123007 Moscow, Russia

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of long-term confinement on stress-permissive neuroendocrine and immune responses in humans. Two groups of four male subjects were confined 240 days (group 240) or 110 days (group 110) in two space modules of 100 or 200 m3, respectively. During confinement, none of the volunteers developed psychic stress as could be examined and verified by a current stress test. However, in group 240 but not in group 110, the diurnal rhythm of cortisol secretion was slightly depressed and the urine excretion of norepinephrine significantly increased. The innate part of the immune system became activated as seen by a rise in the number of circulating granulocytes and the enhanced expression of beta 2-integrins. In contrast, the ratio of T-helper to T-suppressor cells decreased. All these effects, observed during confinement, were even more pronounced in both groups when values of endocrinological and immunological parameters were compared between before and 1 wk after the end of the confinement period. Hence, return to normal life exerts pronounced effects to a much higher degree, irrespective of how long or under which conditions individuals were confined. Because the delayed-type hypersensitivity skin reaction against recall antigens remained unaffected, it is to be presumed that confinement appears to induce distinct sympathoadrenergic activation and immunological changes but no clinically relevant immunosuppression.

stress; leukocytes; cortisol; delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Shimamiya, N. Terada, Y. Hiejima, S. Wakabayashi, H. Kasai, and M. Mohri
Effects of 10-day confinement on the immune system and psychological aspects in humans
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2004; 97(3): 920 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online