Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 91: 2767-2775, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Miskovic, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Miskovic, M. B.
Vol. 91, Issue 6, 2767-2775, December 2001

INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES
Flowmetric comparison of respiratory inductance plethysmography and pneumotachography in horses

Andrew Hoffman1, Heike Kuehn1, Klaus Riedelberger2, Rachel Kupcinskas1, and Mary Beth Miskovic1

1 Department of Clinical Sciences, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536; and 2 Internal Medicine Clinic, Veterinary University, 1210 Vienna, Austria

Respiratory inductance plethysmographic (RIP) and pneumotachographic (Pn) flows were compared dynamically in horses with bronchoconstriction. On a breath-by-breath basis, RIP was normalized to inspiratory volume from Pn, and peak [peak of subtracted final exhalation waveform (SFEmax)] and selected area [integral of subtracted final waveform during first 25% of exhaled volume (SFEint)] differences between RIP and Pn flows during early expiration were measured in three settings: 1) healthy horses (n = 8) undergoing histamine bronchoprovocation; 2) horses with naturally occurring lower airway obstruction (AO) (n = 7); and 3) healthy horses (n = 6) given lobeline · HCl to induce hyperpnea. In setting 1, histamine challenge induced a dose-dependent increase in SFEmax and SFEint differences. A test index of airway reactivity (interpolated histamine dose that increased SFEmax by 35%) closely correlated (rs = 0.93, P = 0.001) with a conventional index (histamine dose that induced a 35% decrease in dynamic compliance). In setting 2, in horses with AO, SFEmax and SFEint were markedly elevated, and their absolute values correlated significantly (P < 0.005) with pulmonary resistance and the maximum change in transpulmonary pressure. The effects of bronchodilator treatment on the SFEmax and SFEint were also highly significant (P < 0.0001). In setting 3, hyperpnea, but not tachypnea, caused significant (P < 0.01) increases in SFEmax but not in SFEint. In conclusion, dynamic comparisons between RIP and Pn provide a defensible method for quantifying AO during tidal breathing, without the need for invasive instrumentation.

noninvasive; dynamic; resistance; gas compression; heaves





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online