Journal of Applied Physiology AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 91: 725-732, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santiago, L. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ultman, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santiago, L. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ultman, J. S.
Vol. 91, Issue 2, 725-732, August 2001

Ozone absorption in the human nose during unidirectional airflow

Lizzie Y. Santiago1, Matthew C. Hann1, Abdellaziz Ben-Jebria1,2, and James S. Ultman1

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and 2 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France

This study addresses the effect of gas flow rate and ozone (O3) concentration on the uptake of this air pollutant in the nose. A nasal exposure system was developed in which a constant flow of humidified air (V) containing a constant concentration of O3 (Cinlet) entered one nostril and then exited the other nostril while a subject closed the velopharyngeal aperture. Experiments were conducted on 10 healthy nonsmokers for whom O3 concentration was measured at the inlet nostril and the outlet nostril to determine the fraction of inhaled O3 that was absorbed into the nasal mucosa (Lambda nose). Lambda nose decreased from 0.80 ± 0.02 to 0.33 ± 0.02 (SE) when V was increased from 3 to 15 l/min and Cinlet was fixed at 0.4 ppm. Analysis of these data with a mathematical model indicated that O3 uptake was limited by diffusion reaction through mucus, rather than by convective diffusion through the respired gas. A small decrease in Lambda nose from 0.36 ± 0.02 to 0.32 ± 0.01 was also observed when Cinlet was increased from 0.1 to 0.4 ppm at a fixed V of 15 l/min. This may have been due to nonlinear reaction kinetics between O3 and reactive substrates in mucus or an active response by a physiological process such as mucus secretion or transepithelial water influx.

dosimetry; inhalation toxicology; nasal cavities; nasal uptake; diffusion resistance; flow effect; concentration effect





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online