Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 91: 218-224, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bassett, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parr, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bassett, D. R., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Parr, B. B.
Vol. 91, Issue 1, 218-224, July 2001

Validity of inspiratory and expiratory methods of measuring gas exchange with a computerized system

David R. Bassett Jr., Edward T. Howley, Dixie L. Thompson, George A. King, Scott J. Strath, James E. McLaughlin, and Brian B. Parr

Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-2700

The accuracy of a computerized metabolic system, using inspiratory and expiratory methods of measuring ventilation, was assessed in eight male subjects. Gas exchange was measured at rest and during five stages on a cycle ergometer. Pneumotachometers were placed on the inspired and expired side to measure inspired (VI) and expired ventilation (VE). The devices were connected to two systems sampling expired O2 and CO2 from a single mixing chamber. Simultaneously, the criterion (Douglas bag, or DB) method assessed VE and fractions of O2 and CO2 in expired gas (FEO2 and FECO2) for subsequent calculation of O2 uptake (VO2), CO2 production (VCO2), and respiratory exchange ratio. Both systems accurately measured metabolic variables over a wide range of intensities. Though differences were found between the DB and computerized systems for FEO2 (both inspired and expired systems), FECO2 (expired system only), and VO2 (inspired system only), the differences were extremely small (FEO2 = 0.0004, FECO2 = -0.0003, VO2 = -0.018 l/min). Thus a computerized system, using inspiratory or expiratory configurations, permits extremely precise measurements to be made in a less time-consuming manner than the DB technique.

Douglas bag; oxygen uptake; carbon dioxide production; metabolism; pneumotachometer


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. F. Zwemer, M. Y. Song, K. A. Carello, and L. G. D'Alecy
Strain differences in response to acute hypoxia: CD-1 versus C57BL/6J mice
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2007; 102(1): 286 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online