Smooth muscle relaxation is expected to yield beneficial effects on hydraulic impedance properties of large vessels. We investigated the effects of intravenous diltiazem infusion on aortic wall stiffness and local hydraulic impedance properties. In seven anesthetized, closed-chest dogs, instantaneous cross-sectional area and pressure of the descending thoracic aorta were measured using transesophageal echocardiography combined with acoustic quantification and a micromanometer, respectively. Data were acquired during a vena caval balloon inflation, both at the control condition and with diltiazem infusion. At the operating point, diltiazem reduced blood pressure in all dogs but did not alter aortic dimensions or wall stiffness. Over the observed pressure range, aortic area-pressure relationships were linear. Whereas diltiazem affected the slope of this relationship variably (no change in 3 dogs, increase in 1 dog, decrease in 3 dogs), the zero-pressure area intercept was significantly increased in every case such that higher area was observed at any given pressure. When comparisons were made at a common level of wall stress, wall stiffness was either increased or unchanged during diltiazem infusion. In contrast, diltiazem decreased wall stiffness in every case when comparisons were made at a common level of aortic midwall radius. Aortic characteristic impedance and pulse wave velocity, components of left ventricular hydraulic load that are determined by aortic elastic and geometric properties, were affected variably. A comparison of wall stiffness at matched wall stress appears inappropriate for assessing changes in smooth muscle tone. Because of the competing effects of changes in vessel diameter and wall stiffness, smooth muscle relaxation is not necessarily accompanied by the expected beneficial changes in local aortic hydraulic impedance. These results can be reconciled by recognizing that components other than vascular smooth muscle (e.g., elastin, collagen) contribute to aortic wall stiffness.