Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 90: 1943-1954, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Havenith, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Havenith, G.
Vol. 90, Issue 5, 1943-1954, May 2001

Individualized model of human thermoregulation for the simulation of heat stress response

George Havenith1,2

1 TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg 3769ZG, The Netherlands; and 2 Human Thermal Environments Laboratory, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, United Kingdom

A population-based dynamic model of human thermoregulation was expanded with control equations incorporating the individual person's characteristics (body surface area, mass, fat%, maximal O2 uptake, acclimation). These affect both the passive (heat capacity, insulation) and active systems (sweating and skin blood flow function). Model parameters were estimated from literature data. Other data, collected for the study of individual differences {working at relative or absolute workloads in hot-dry [45°C, 20% relative humidity (rh)], warm-humid [35°C, 80% rh], and cool [21°C, 50% rh] environments}, were used for validation. The individualized model provides an improved prediction [mean core temperature error, -0.21 right-arrow -0.07°C (P < 0.001); mean squared error, 0.40 right-arrow 0.16°C, (P < 0.001)]. The magnitude of improvement varies substantially with the climate and work type. Relative to an empirical multiple-regression model derived from these specific data sets, the analytical simulation model has between 54 and 89% of its predictive power, except for the cool climate, in which this ratio is zero. In conclusion, individualization of the model allows improved prediction of heat strain, although a substantial error remains.

heat strain; body temperature; exercise; body fat; fitness


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
O. Jay, F. D. Reardon, P. Webb, M. B. DuCharme, T. Ramsay, L. Nettlefold, and G. P. Kenny
Estimating changes in mean body temperature for humans during exercise using core and skin temperatures is inaccurate even with a correction factor
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2007; 103(2): 443 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
G. P. Kenny and O. Jay
Sex differences in postexercise esophageal and muscle tissue temperature response
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): R1632 - R1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online