Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 90: 1447-1454, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bellare, J. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bellare, J. R
Vol. 90, Issue 4, 1447-1454, April 2001

Scoring of surface parameters of physiological relevance to surfactant therapy in respiratory distress syndrome

R. Banerjee1 and Jayesh R Bellare2

1 School of Biomedical Engineering and 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay 400 076, India

The Wilhelmy balance was used for in vitro testing of surface parameters of surfactants used for respiratory distress syndrome therapy. Two commercial protein-free surfactants, ALEC and Exosurf, were compared with pure forms of the three main phospholipids in natural surfactants, dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and their binary mixtures, PC with PE and PG each in the ratio 2:3. Surface excess films (15 Å2/molecule) were compressed at 1.2 cycles/min past collapse to a compression ratio of 4:1. The maximum surface pressure, spreading time, compressibility, respreading ratio, recruitment index, and hysteresis area were compared. A consolidated list of criteria for selection of suitable surfactants was compiled from the literature. A relative scoring system was devised for comparison based on these criteria. PC/PG (2:3) performed the best as it fulfilled all the criteria and obtained the highest relative score. Exosurf also performed well, except on the respreading criterion. ALEC and PC/PE were equivalent in their performance and performed well, except on two criteria: hysteresis area and recruitment index. Thus the scoring system proposed here proved valuable to rate the overall efficacy as well as relative merits of surfactant formulations.

surface pressure; Wilhelmy balance





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online