Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 90: 127-132, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Welsch, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Welsch, M. A.
Vol. 90, Issue 1, 127-132, January 2001

Influence of head-down and lateral decubitus neck flexion on heart rate variability

C. Matthew Lee, Robert H. Wood, and Michael A. Welsch

Department of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803

The purpose of this study was to examine the response of heart rate variability (HRV), a noninvasive index of autonomic control, to head-down neck flexion (HDNF), which engages both otoliths and neck muscle afferents, and to lateral decubitus neck flexion (LNF), in which neck afferents are activated, whereas otolith afferent input is not. HRV and forearm blood flow were evaluated in participants lying prone, during HDNF, lying in the lateral decubitus position, and during LNF. Compared with the prone position, HDNF resulted in lower high-frequency (46.9 ± 7.1 vs. 62.3 ± 6.2) and higher low-frequency (53.1 ± 7.1 vs. 37.7 ± 6.2) power, expressed as normalized units, along with higher low-frequency-to-high-frequency ratio (1.65 ± 0.3 vs. 0.78 ± 0.2), whereas LNF resulted in no alterations in HRV indexes. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in forearm blood flow or vascular resistance among any of the positions. Our data suggest that otolith organs influence autonomic modulation of the heart, supporting previous studies reporting that HDNF elicits increased sympathetic outflow. These data further suggest that HDNF results in a parasympathetic withdrawal from the heart in addition to sympathetic activation.

autonomic; otoliths; muscle afferents


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
W. H. Cooke, J. R. Carter, and T. A. Kuusela
Human cerebrovascular and autonomic rhythms during vestibular activation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): R838 - R843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. D. Monahan and C. A. Ray
Interactive effect of hypoxia and otolith organ engagement on cardiovascular regulation in humans
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2002; 93(2): 576 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. D. Monahan, M. K. Sharpe, D. Drury, A. C. Ertl, and C. A. Ray
Influence of vestibular activation on respiration in humans
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): R689 - R694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online