Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 89: 1114-1122, 2000;
8750-7587/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gehring, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Amis, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gehring, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Amis, T. C.
Vol. 89, Issue 3, 1114-1122, September 2000

Nasal resistance and flow resistive work of nasal breathing during exercise: effects of a nasal dilator strip

J. M. Gehring, S. R. Garlick, J. R. Wheatley, and T. C. Amis

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia

Using posterior rhinomanometry, we measured nasal airflow resistance (Rn) and flow-resistive work of nasal breathing (WONB), with an external nasal dilator strip (ENDS) and without (control), in 15 healthy adults (6 men, 9 women) during exclusive nasal breathing and graded (50-230 W) exercise on a cycle ergometer. ENDS decreased resting inspiratory and/or expiratory Rn (at 0.4 l/s) by >0.5 cmH2O · l-1 · s in 11 subjects ("responders"). Inspired ventilation (VI) increased with external work rate, but tended to be greater with ENDS. Inspiratory and expiratory Rn (at 0.4 l/s) decreased as VI increased but, in responders, tended to remain lower with ENDS. Inspiratory (but not expiratory) Rn at peak nasal airflow (Vn) increased as VI increased but, again, was lower with ENDS. At a VI of ~35 l/min, ENDS decreased flow limitation and hysteresis of the inspiratory transnasal pressure-flow curve. In responders, ENDS reduced inspiratory WONB per breath and inspiratory nasal power values during exercise. We conclude that ENDS stiffens the lateral nasal vestibule walls and, in responders, may reduce the energy required for nasal ventilation during exercise.

work of breathing


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
A. J. MOSES and M. LIEBERMAN
The effect of external nasal dilators on blood oxygen levels in dental patients
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2003; 134(1): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. FARRE, M. MANCINI, M. ROTGER, M. FERRER, J. ROCA, and D. NAVAJAS
Oscillatory Resistance Measured during Noninvasive Proportional Assist Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2001; 164(5): 790 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online