|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Selly Oak Hospital, Birmingham B29 6JD, UK; and 2 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Previous studies have shown that the added resistance of a mini-Wright peak expiratory flow (PEF) meter reduced PEF by ~8% in normal subjects because of gas compression reducing thoracic gas volume at PEF and thus driving elastic recoil pressure. We undertook a body plethysmographic study in 15 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), age 65.9 ± 6.3 yr (mean ± SD, range 53-75 yr), to examine whether their recorded PEF was also limited by the added resistance of a PEF meter. The PEF meter increased alveolar pressure at PEF (Ppeak) from 3.7 ± 1.4 to 4.7 ± 1.5 kPa (P = 0.01), and PEF was reduced from 3.6 ± 1.3 l/s to 3.2 ± 0.9 l/s (P = 0.01). The influence of flow limitation on PEF and Ppeak was evaluated by a simple four-parameter model based on the wave-speed concept. We conclude that added external resistance in patients with COPD reduced PEF by the same mechanisms as in healthy subjects. Furthermore, the much lower Ppeak in COPD patients is a consequence of more severe flow limitation than in healthy subjects and not of deficient muscle strength.
peak flow determining factors; thoracic gas compression; added expiratory resistance; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; peak expiratory flow
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Pellegrino, G. Viegi, V. Brusasco, R. O. Crapo, F. Burgos, R. Casaburi, A. Coates, C. P. M. van der Grinten, P. Gustafsson, J. Hankinson, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2005; 26(5): 948 - 968. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |