Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 89: 242-250, 2000;
8750-7587/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pandolf, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pandolf, K. B.
Vol. 89, Issue 1, 242-250, July 2000

Role of core temperature as a stimulus for cold acclimation during repeated immersion in 20°C water

Catherine O'Brien1, Andrew J. Young1, Dae T. Lee2, Avraham Shitzer3, Michael N. Sawka1, and Kent B. Pandolf1

1 Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-5007; 2 Korean Sport Science Institute, 110-030 Seoul, Korea; and 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel

The relative importance of skin vs. core temperature for stimulating cold acclimation (CA) was examined by 5 wk of daily 1-h water immersions (20°C) in resting (RG) and exercising (EG) subjects. Rectal temperature fell (0.8°C; P < 0.05) during immersion only in RG. Skin temperature fell (P < 0.05) similarly in both groups. Physiological responses during cold-air exposure (90 min, 5°C) were assessed before and after CA. Body temperatures and metabolic heat production were similar in both groups with no change due to CA. Cardiac output was lower (P < 0.05) in both groups post-CA (10.4 ± 1.2 l/min) than pre-CA (12.2 ± 1.0 l/min), but mean arterial pressure was unchanged (pre-CA 107 ± 2 mmHg, post-CA 101 ± 2 mmHg). The increase in norepinephrine was greater (P < 0.05) post-CA (954 ± 358 pg/ml) compared with pre-CA (1,577 ± 716 pg/ml) for RG, but CA had no effect on the increase in norepinephrine for EG (pre-CA 1,288 ± 438 pg/ml, post-CA 1,074 ± 279 pg/ml). Skin temperature reduction alone may be a sufficient stimulus during CA for increased vasoconstrictor response, but core temperature reduction appears necessary to enhance sympathetic activation during cold exposure.

insulation; norepinephrine; cold-induced vasodilation


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. O'Brien
Reproducibility of the cold-induced vasodilation response in the human finger
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2005; 98(4): 1334 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online