Discrepancies in the assessment of thoracoabdominal asynchrony are observed depending on the choice of respiratory movement sensors. We test the hypothesis that these discrepancies are due to a different dependence of the sensors on cross-sectional perimeter and area variations of the chest wall. First, we study the phase shift between perimeter and area (_PA) for an elliptical model, which is deformed by sinusoidal changes of its principal axes. We show that perimeter and area vary sinusoidally in the physiological range of deformations, and we discuss how _PA depends on the ellipticity of the cross section, on the ratio of transverse and dorsoventral movement amplitudes, and on their phase difference. Second, we compute the relationship between perimeter, area, and the output of the inductive sensor, and we proceed by comparing inductive plethysmography with strain gauges for several cross section deformations. We demonstrate that both sensors can provide different phase information for identical cross section deformations and, hence, can estimate thoracoabdominal asynchrony differently. Furthermore, the complex dependence of the inductive sensor on perimeter and area warns against this sensor for the evaluation of thoracoabdominal asynchrony.