Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 87: 1397-1403, 1999;
8750-7587/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, N. A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, N. A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, J. B.
Vol. 87, Issue 4, 1397-1403, October 1999

INVITED REVIEW
Static respiratory muscle work during immersion with positive and negative respiratory loading

Nigel A. S. Taylor1 and James B. Morrison2

1 Department of Biomedical Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia; and 2 School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia Canada, V5A 1S6

Upright immersion imposes a pressure imbalance across the thorax. This study examined the effects of air-delivery pressure on inspiratory muscle work during upright immersion. Eight subjects performed respiratory pressure-volume relaxation maneuvers while seated in air (control) and during immersion. Hydrostatic, respiratory elastic (lung and chest wall), and resultant static respiratory muscle work components were computed. During immersion, the effects of four air-delivery pressures were evaluated: mouth pressure (uncompensated); the pressure at the lung centroid (PL,c); and at PL,c ±0.98 kPa. When breathing at pressures less than the PL,c, subjects generally defended an expiratory reserve volume (ERV) greater than the immersed relaxation volume, minus residual volume, resulting in additional inspiratory muscle work. The resultant static inspiratory muscle work, computed over a 1-liter tidal volume above the ERV, increased from 0.23 J · l-1, when subjects were breathing at PL,c, to 0.83 J · l-1 at PL,c -0.98 kPa (P < 0.05), and to 1.79 J · l-1 at mouth pressure (P < 0.05). Under the control state, and during the above experimental conditions, static expiratory work was minimal. When breathing at PL,c +0.98 kPa, subjects adopted an ERV less than the immersed relaxation volume, minus residual volume, resulting in 0.36 J · l-1 of expiratory muscle work. Thus static inspiratory muscle work varied with respiratory loading, whereas PL,c air supply minimized this work during upright immersion, restoring lung-tissue, chest-wall, and static muscle work to levels obtained in the control state.

breathing apparatus; lung centroid pressure; pressure breathing; pulmonary mechanics; static loading; work of breathing


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. E. Moon, A. D. Cherry, B. W. Stolp, and E. M. Camporesi
Pulmonary gas exchange in diving
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 668 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. Chaunchaiyakul, H. Groeller, J. R. Clarke, and N. A. S. Taylor
The impact of aging and habitual physical activity on static respiratory work at rest and during exercise
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): L1098 - L1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online