Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 87: 428-437, 1999;
8750-7587/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diehl, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Lofaso, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diehl, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Lofaso, F.
Vol. 87, Issue 1, 428-437, July 1999

Physiological effects of alveolar, tracheal, and "standard" pressure supports

Jean-Luc Diehl1, Daniel Isabey1, Gilbert Desmarais2, Laurent Brochard1, Alain Harf1, and Frédéric Lofaso1

1 Service de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 492, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil; and 2 École Supérieure d'Ingénieurs en Électrotechnique et Électronique, 93160 Noisy le Grand, France

Pressure support (PS) is characterized by a pressure plateau, which is usually generated at the ventilator level (PSvent). We have built a PS device in which the pressure plateau can be obtained at the upper airway level (PSaw) or at the alveolar level (PSA). The effect of these different PS modes was evaluated in seven healthy men during air breathing and 5% CO2 breathing. Minute ventilation during air breathing was higher with PSA than with PSaw and lower with PSvent (16 ± 3, 14 ± 3, and 11 ± 2 l/min, respectively). By contrast, there were no significant differences in minute ventilation during 5% CO2 breathing (25 ± 5, 27 ± 7, and 23 ± 5 l/min, respectively). The esophageal pressure-time product per minute was lower with PSA than with PSaw and PSvent during air breathing (29 ± 26, 44 ± 44, and 48 ± 30 cmH2O · s, respectively) and 5% CO2 breathing (97 ± 40, 145 ± 62, and 220 ± 41 cmH2O · s, respectively). In conclusion, during PS, moving the inspiratory pressure plateau from the ventilator to the alveolar level reduces pressure output, particularly at high ventilation levels.

control of breathing; positive inspiratory pressure; unloading





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online