Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 85: 1855-1862, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sériès, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marc, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sériès, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marc, I.
Vol. 85, Issue 5, 1855-1862, November 1998

Effects of inspiratory and expiratory positive pressure difference on airflow dynamics during sleep

F. Sériès and I. Marc

Unité de Recherche, Centre de Pneumologie de l'Hôpital Laval, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1V 4G5

We measured the effects of dissociating inspiratory and expiratory positive pressure (PI and PE, respectively) on the inspiratory flow limitation pattern and on genioglossus (GG) activity in nine sleep apnea patients. Measurements were made at two different levels of PI with stepwise increases in PE. Flow-limited breaths were observed during each recording session. In six of nine subjects, maximal inspiratory flow (VImax) was correlated with the difference between PI and PE (correlations were negative in 5 subjects, positive in 1 subject). In three other patients, VImax was not influenced by the amount of pressure difference. A positive relationship between tonic and/or phasic GG electromyographic activities and PI-PE difference was observed at least at one PI level in all patients. This correlation was observed independently of the presence or absence of any relationship between VImax and the amount of pressure difference. Our results suggest that increasing the PI-PE difference (i.e., decreasing PE) may be associated with a significant worsening in inspiratory flow limitation and that the VImax-pressure difference behavior is not dependent on the GG electromyographic-pressure response.

genioglossus; sleep apnea; hypopnea; upper airways; electromyography


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. C. Heinzer, M. L. Stanchina, A. Malhotra, R. B. Fogel, S. R. Patel, A. S. Jordan, K. Schory, and D. P. White
Lung Volume and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Requirements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2005; 172(1): 114 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online