Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 85: 1376-1383, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heil, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heil, D. P.
Vol. 85, Issue 4, 1376-1383, October 1998

Scaling of submaximal oxygen uptake with body mass and combined mass during uphill treadmill bicycling

Daniel P. Heil

Department of Exercise Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003

This study examined the scaling relationships of net O2 uptake [VO2(net) = VO2 - resting VO2] to body mass (MB) and combined mass (MC = MB + bicycle) during uphill treadmill bicycling. It was hypothesized that VO2(net) (l/min) would scale proportionally with MC [i.e., VO2(net) proportional to  M1.0C] and less than proportionally with MB [i.e., VO2(net) proportional to  MB]. Twenty-five competitive cyclists [73.9 ± 8.8 and 85.0 ± 9.0 (SD) kg for MB and MC, respectively] rode their bicycles on a treadmill at 3.46 m/s and grades of 1.7, 3.5, 5.2, and 7.0% while VO2 was measured. Multiple log-linear regression procedures were applied to the pooled VO2(net) data to determine the exponents for MC and MB after statistically controlling for differences in treadmill grade and dynamic friction. The regression models were highly significant (R2 = 0.95, P < 0.001). Exponents for MC (0.99, 95% confidence interval = 0.80-1.18) and MB (0.89, 95% confidence interval = 0.72-1.07) did not differ significantly from each other or 1.0. It was concluded that the 0.99 MC exponent was due to gravitational resistance, whereas the MB exponent was <1.0 because the bicycles were relatively lighter for heavier cyclists.

allometry; regression





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online