Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 2052-2059, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potard, U. S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fedde, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potard, U. S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fedde, M. R.
Vol. 84, Issue 6, 2052-2059, June 1998

Force, speed, and oxygen consumption in Thoroughbred and draft horses

U. Silke Birlenbach Potard1, David E. Leith2, and M. Roger Fedde1

1 Department of Anatomy and Physiology and 2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506

Thoroughbred (TB) and draft horses (DH) have long been selected for tasks of very different intensities and force-speed relationships. To study their adaptations, we measured O2 consumption and related variables in three TB and four DH during progressive exercise tests on a level treadmill. The horses exerted a draft force of 0, 5, 10, 15, or 20% of their body weight at speeds that increased by 2 m/s every 3 min until they could not maintain that speed. We found that TB could exert the same draft forces as DH and, at each force, TB achieved about twice the speed, twice the external power, and twice the O2 consumption as DH; thus the two breeds had the same gross efficiencies. We also found maximal O2 consumption of TB to be about twice that of DH (134 vs. 72 ml · kg-1 · min-1, respectively), suggesting adaptations to high-intensity exercise. Peak efficiency was reached at lower speeds in DH than in TB, suggesting adaptations to high-force, low-speed exercise. These differences between TB and DH in force-speed and aerobic capacities and in speed for peak efficiency likely reflect different contraction velocities in locomotor muscles.

equine; exercise; force-speed relationships; external power; gross efficiency


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. M. Griffin, R. Kram, S. J. Wickler, and D. F. Hoyt
Biomechanical and energetic determinants of the walk-trot transition in horses
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4215 - 4223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Minetti, L. ArdigO, E Reinach, and F Saibene
The relationship between mechanical work and energy expenditure of locomotion in horses
J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 1999; 202(17): 2329 - 2338.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online