Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 1581-1588, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gisolfi, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gisolfi, C. V.
Vol. 84, Issue 5, 1581-1588, May 1998

Effect of hypohydration on gastric emptying and intestinal absorption during exercise

A. J. Ryan, G. P. Lambert, X. Shi, R. T. Chang, R. W. Summers, and C. V. Gisolfi

Departments of Exercise Science and Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

Dehydration and hyperthermia may impair gastric emptying (GE) during exercise; the effect of these alterations on intestinal water flux (WF) is unknown. Thus the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hypohydration (~2.7% body weight) on GE and WF of a water placebo (WP) during cycling exercise (85 min, 65% maximal oxygen uptake) in a cool environment (22°C) and to also compare GE and WF of three carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions (CES) while the subjects were hypohydrated. GE and WF were determined simultaneously by a nasogastric tube placed in the gastric antrum and via a multilumen tube that spanned the duodenum and the first 25 cm of jejunum. Hypohydration was attained 12-16 h before experiments by low-intensity exercise in a hot (45°C), humid (relative humidity 50%) environment. Seven healthy subjects (age 26.7 ± 1.7 yr, maximal oxygen uptake 55.9 ± 8.2 ml · kg-1 · min-1) ingested either WP or a 6% (330 mosmol), 8% (400 mosmol), or a 9% (590 mosmol) CES the morning following hypohydration. For comparison, subjects ingested WP after a euhydration protocol. Solutions (~2.0 liters total) were ingested as a large bolus (4.6 ml/kg body wt) 5 min before exercise and as small serial feedings (2.3 ml/kg body wt) every 10 min of exercise. Average GE rates were not different among conditions (P > 0.05). Mean (±SE) values for WF were also similar (P > 0.05) for the euhydration (15.3 ± 1.7 ml · cm-1 · h-1) and hypohydration (18.3 ± 2.6 ml · cm-1 · h-1) experiments. During exercise after hypohydration, water absorption was greater (P < 0.05) with ingestion of WP (18.3 ± 2.6) and the 6% CES (16.5 ± 3.7), compared with the 8% CES (6.9 ± 1.5) and the 9% CES (1.8 ± 1.7). Mean values for final core temperature (38.6 ± 0.1°C), heart rate (152 ± 1 beats/min), and change in plasma volume (-5.7 ± 0.7%) were similar among experimental trials. We conclude that 1) hypohydration to ~3% body weight does not impair GE or fluid absorption during moderate exercise when ingesting WP, and 2) hyperosmolality (>400 mosmol) reduced WF in the proximal intestine.

segmental perfusion; osmolality; plasma volume





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online