Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 486-491, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henke, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henke, K. G.

Vol. 84, Issue 2, 486-491, February 1998

Upper airway muscle activity and upper airway resistance in young adults during sleep

Kathe G. Henke

Sleep Disorders Center of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia 23226

Henke, Kathe G. Upper airway muscle activity and upper airway resistance in young adults during sleep. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(2): 486-491, 1998.---To determine the relationship between upper airway muscle activity and upper airway resistance in nonsnoring and snoring young adults, 17 subjects were studied during sleep. Genioglossus and alae nasi electromyogram activity were recorded. Inspiratory and expiratory supraglottic resistance (Rinsp and Rexp, respectively) were measured at peak flow, and the coefficients of resistance (Kinsp and Kexp, respectively) were calculated. Data were recorded during control, with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and on the breath immediately after termination of CPAP. Rinsp during control averaged 7 ± 1 and 10 ± 2 cmH2O · l-1 · s and Kinsp averaged 26 ± 5 and 80 ± 27 cmH2O · l-1 · s-2 in the nonsnorers and snorers, respectively (P = not significant). On the breath immediately after CPAP, Kinsp did not increase over control in snorers (80 ± 27 for control vs. 46 ± 6 cmH2O · l-1 · s-2 for the breath after CPAP) or nonsnorers (26 ± 5 vs. 29 ± 6 cmH2O · l-1 · s-2). These findings held true for Rinsp. Kexp did not increase in either group on the breath immediately after termination of CPAP. Therefore, 1) increases in upper airway resistance do not occur, despite reductions in electromyogram activity in young snorers and nonsnorers, and 2) increases in Rexp and expiratory flow limitation are not observed in young snorers.

respiratory muscles; obstructive sleep apnea; snoring


The Journal of Applied Physiology 84(2):486-491
8750-7587/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Thurnheer, P. K. Wraith, and N. J. Douglas
Influence of age and gender on upper airway resistance in NREM and REM sleep
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2001; 90(3): 981 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. J. GOTTLIEB, Q. YAO, S. REDLINE, T. ALI, and M. W. MAHOWALD
Does Snoring Predict Sleepiness Independently of Apnea and Hypopnea Frequency?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2000; 162(4): 1512 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. A. Waters, F. McBrien, P. Stewart, M. Hinder, and S. Wharton
Effects of OSA, inhalational anesthesia, and fentanyl on the airway and ventilation of children
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 1987 - 1994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online