Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 97-106, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ettema, G. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ettema, G. J. C.

Vol. 84, Issue 1, 97-106, January 1998

Stretch-shorten cycle compared with isometric preload: contributions to enhanced muscular performance

Andrew D. Walshe1, Greg J. Wilson1, and Gertjan J. C. Ettema2

1 School of Exercise Science and Sports Management, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales 2480; and 2 Department of Anatomical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia

Walshe, Andrew D., Greg J. Wilson, and Gertjan J. C. Ettema. Stretch-shorten cycle compared with isometric preload: contributions to enhanced muscular performance. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(1): 97-106, 1998.---To isolate any difference muscular contraction history may have on concentric work output, 40 trained male subjects performed three separate isokinetic concentric squats that involved differing contraction histories: 1) a concentric-only (CO) squat, 2) a concentric squat preceded by an isometric preload (IS), and 3) a stretch-shorten cycle (SSC) squat. Over the first 300 ms of the concentric movement, work output for both the SSC and IS conditions was significantly greater (154.8 ± 39.8 and 147.9 ± 34.7 J, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with the CO squat (129.7 ± 34.4 J). In addition, work output after the SSC test over the first 300 ms was also significantly larger than that for the corresponding period after the IS protocol (P < 0.05). There was no difference in normalized, integrated electromyogram among any of the conditions. It was concluded that concentric performance enhancement derived from a preceding stretch of the muscle-tendon complex was largely due to the attainment of a higher active muscle state before the start of the concentric movement. However, it was also hypothesized that contractile element potentiation was a significant contributor to stretch-induced muscular performance under these conditions.

potentiation; preforce; isokinetic squat; contraction history


The Journal of Applied Physiology 84(1):97-106
0161-7567/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
T. Omar, H. Alawadhi, A. O. Soubani, and G. E. Tzelepis
Peak Expiratory Flow With or Without a Brief Postinspiratory Pause
Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 442 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online