Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 335-343, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannella-Neto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Melo, M. F. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannella-Neto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Melo, M. F. V.

Vol. 84, Issue 1, 335-343, January 1998

Design and calibration of unicapillary pneumotachographs

A. Giannella-Neto, C. Bellido, R. B. Barbosa, and M. F. Vidal Melo

Biomedical Engineering Program, Graduate School of Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21945-970

Giannella-Neto, A., C. Bellido, R. B. Barbosa, and M. F. Vidal Melo. Design and calibration of unicapillary pneumotachographs. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(1): 335-343, 1998.---This study presents a method for design and calibration of unicapillary pneumotachographs for small-animal experiments. The design, based on Poiseuille's law, defines a set of internal radius and length values that allows for laminar flow, measurable pressure differences, and minimal interference with animal's respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. A third-order polynomial calibration (Pol) of the pressure-flow relationship was employed and compared with linear calibration (Lin). Tests were done for conditions of ambient pressure (Pam) and positive pressure (Ppos) ventilation at different flow ranges. A physical model designed to match normal and low compliance in rats was used. At normal compliance, Pol provided lower errors than Lin for mixed (1-12 ml/s), mean (4-10 ml/s), and high (8-12 ml/s) flow rate calibrations for both Pam and Ppos inspiratory tests (P < 0.001 for all conditions) and expiratory tests (P < 0.001 for all conditions). At low compliance, they differed significantly with 8.6 ± 4.1% underestimation when Lin at Pam was used in Ppos tests. Ppos calibration, preferably in combination with Pol, should be used in this case to minimize errors (Pol = 0.8 ± 0.5%, Lin = 6.5 ± 4.0%, P < 0.0005). Nonlinear calibration may be useful for improvement of flow and volume measurements in small animals during both Pam and Ppos ventilation.

small animals; flow and volume measurement; mechanical ventilation; physical model


The Journal of Applied Physiology 84(1):335-343
0161-7567/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
Y. Tang, M. J. Turner, J. S. Yem, and A. B. Baker
Calibration of pneumotachographs using a calibrated syringe
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2003; 95(2): 571 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online