|
|
||||||||
Vol. 83, Issue 5, 1517-1521, 1997
1 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; and 2 Department of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Selly Oak Hospital, Birmingham B29 6JD, United Kingdom
Received 8 April 1997; accepted in final form 7 July 1997.
Pedersen, O. F., T. F. Pedersen, and M. R. Miller. Gas
compression in lungs decreases peak expiratory flow depending on
resistance of peak flowmeter. J. Appl.
Physiol. 83(5): 1517-1521, 1997.
It has recently
been shown (O. F. Pedersen T. R. Rasmussen, Ø. Omland, T. Sigsgaard, P. H. Quanjer, and M. R. Miller. Eur. Respir. J. 9: 828-833, 1996) that the added
resistance of a mini-Wright peak flowmeter decreases peak expiratory
flow (PEF) by ~8% compared with PEF measured by a pneumotachograph.
To explore the reason for this, 10 healthy men (mean age 43 yr, range
33-58 yr) were examined in a body plethysmograph with facilities
to measure mouth flow vs. expired volume as well as the change in
thoracic gas volume (Vb) and alveolar pressure
(PA). The subjects performed forced vital capacity maneuvers through orifices of different sizes and
also a mini-Wright peak flowmeter. PEF with the meter and other added
resistances were achieved when flow reached the perimeter of the
flow-Vb curves. The mini-Wright PEF meter decreased PEF from 11.4 ± 1.5 to 10.3 ± 1.4 (SD) l/s
(P < 0.001),
PA increased from 6.7 ± 1.9 to 9.3 ± 2.7 kPa (P < 0.001), an
increase equal to the pressure drop across the meter, and caused Vb at
PEF to decrease by 0.24 ± 0.09 liter
(P < 0.001). We conclude that PEF obtained with an added resistance like a mini-Wright PEF meter is a
wave-speed-determined maximal flow, but the added resistance causes gas
compression because of increased
PA at PEF. Therefore, Vb at PEF
and, accordingly, PEF decrease.
peak flow-determining factors; thoracic gas compression; added expiratory resistance
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Sharafkhaneh, T. G. Babb, T. M. Officer, N. A. Hanania, H. Sharafkhaneh, and A. M. Boriek The Confounding Effects of Thoracic Gas Compression on Measurement of Acute Bronchodilator Response Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2007; 175(4): 330 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Miller, J. Hankinson, V. Brusasco, F. Burgos, R. Casaburi, A. Coates, R. Crapo, P. Enright, C. P. M. van der Grinten, P. Gustafsson, et al. Standardisation of spirometry Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2005; 26(2): 319 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ebihara, H. Saito, A. Kanda, M. Nakajoh, H. Takahashi, H. Arai, and H. Sasaki Impaired Efficacy of Cough in Patients With Parkinson Disease Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 1009 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Miller and O. F. Pedersen Peak flowmeter resistance decreases peak expiratory flow in subjects with COPD J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2000; 89(1): 283 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |