Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 83: 503-510, 1997;
8750-7587/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fee, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by English, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fee, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by English, M. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 503-510, August 1997
CONTROL OF BREATHING, CIRCULATION, AND TEMPERATURE

Enhanced ventilatory and exercise performance in athletes with slight expiratory resistive loading

Lawrence L. Fee, Richard M. Smith, and Michael B. English

Physiology Department, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

Received 16 April 1996; accepted in final form 4 April 1997.

Fee, Lawrence L., Richard M. Smith, and Michael B. English. Enhanced ventilatory and exercise performance in athletes with slight expiratory resistive loading. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(2): 503-510, 1997.---We determined the cardiorespiratory and performance effects of slight (1.5-3.0 cmH2O) expiratory resistive loading (ERL). Twenty-eight highly fit [peak O2 uptake (VO2 peak) = 63.6 ± 1.3 ml · kg-1 · min-1] athletes (age = 33.5 ± 1.3 yr) performed paired VO2 peak cycle ergometer tests (control vs. ERL). End-expiratory lung volume was separately determined in a subset of subjects (n = 12) at steady-state 75% maximum power output (POmax) and was found to increase (0.67 ± 0.29 liter) with ERL. In the VO2 peak tests, peak expiratory pressure at the mouth, mean inspiratory flow, minute ventilation, and O2 pulse were greater with ERL at every intensity level (i.e., 75, 80, 85, and 90% POmax). Increased minute ventilation was largely due to a trend toward increased tidal volume (P < 0.05 at 80% POmax). O2 uptake was greater at 90% POmax with ERL. Increased O2 pulse with ERL at comparative workloads suggests that stroke volume was augmented with ERL. Also, with ERL, athletes attained higher VO2 peak (63.0 ± 1.4 vs. 60.1 ± 1.3 ml · kg-1 · min-1) and greater POmax (352.0 ± 9.9 vs. 345.7 ± 9.5 W). We conclude that elevated end-expiratory lung volume in response to slight ERL during strenuous exercise served to attenuate both airflow and blood flow limitations, which enhanced exercise capacity.

expiratory resistance; exercise capacity; airflow limitation; end-expiratory lung volume


0161-7567/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. C.W. Hsia
Coordinated Adaptation of Oxygen Transport in Cardiopulmonary Disease
Circulation, August 21, 2001; 104(8): 963 - 969.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online