Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 81: 1908-1910, 1996;
8750-7587/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roach, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Icenogle, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roach, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Icenogle, M. V.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 1908-1910, November 1996
ENVIRONMENT

Acute mountain sickness: increased severity during simulated altitude compared with normobaric hypoxia

Robert C. Roach, Jack A. Loeppky, and Milton V. Icenogle

Copenhagen Muscle Research Center, Rigshospitalet, DK 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; The Lovelace Institutes, and Department of Cardiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108

Received 29 January 1996; accepted in final form 17 June 1996.

Roach, Robert C., Jack A. Loeppky, and Milton V. Icenogle. Acute mountain sickness: increased severity during simulated altitude compared with normobaric hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(5): 1908-1910, 1996.---Acute mountain sickness (AMS) strikes those in the mountains who go too high too fast. Although AMS has been long assumed to be due solely to the hypoxia of high altitude, recent evidence suggests that hypobaria may also make a significant contribution to the pathophysiology of AMS. We studied nine healthy men exposed to simulated altitude, normobaric hypoxia, and normoxic hypobaria in an environmental chamber for 9 h on separate occasions. To simulate altitude, the barometric pressure was lowered to 432 ± 2 (SE) mmHg (simulated terrestrial altitude 4,564 m). Normobaric hypoxia resulted from adding nitrogen to the chamber (maintained near normobaric conditions) to match the inspired PO2 of the altitude exposure. By lowering the barometric pressure and adding oxygen, we achieved normoxic hypobaria with the same inspired PO2 as in our laboratory at normal pressure. AMS symptom scores (average scores from 6 and 9 h of exposure) were higher during simulated altitude (3.7 ± 0.8) compared with either normobaric hypoxia (2.0 ± 0.8; P < 0.01) or normoxic hypobaria (0.4 ± 0.2; P < 0.01). In conclusion, simulated altitude induces AMS to a greater extent than does either normobaric hypoxia or normoxic hypobaria, although normobaric hypoxia induced some AMS.

high-altitude illness; hypobaria; barometric pressure


0161-7567/96 $5.00 Copyright © 1996 the American Physiological Society




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Frisch, F. Waldhauser, T. Waldhor, A. Mullner-Eidenbock, P. Neupane, and K. Schweitzer
Increase in 6-Hydroxymelatonin Excretion in Humans during Ascent to High Altitudes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4388 - 4390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online