Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 81: 58-68, 1996;
8750-7587/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merfeld, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merfeld, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 81, Issue 1 58-68, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Perceptual responses to linear acceleration after spaceflight: human neurovestibular studies on SLS-2

D. M. Merfeld, K. A. Polutchko and K. Schultz
Man-Vehicle Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridg 02139, USA. dmm@nsi.lhs.org

Perceptual responses of four astronauts were measured before and after a 14-day Spacelab Life Sciences-2 mission during interaural (y-axis) and rostrocaudal (z-axis) linear acceleration to measure adaptive changes in perceptual responses to inertial cues. In one test, subjects used a joystick to null a pseudorandom velocity disturbance. Postflight, two of three subjects showed a significantly enhanced ability to null linear self-motion in the y-axis and z-axis orientations. In another test, the subjects used a joystick to indicate their direction of motion during a series of low-acceleration steps. The postflight responses of three of the four subjects showed a significant increase in the response latency for both y-axis and z-axis orientations. In a third test, subjects were asked to track a stationary but unseen target with their eyes while they translated linearly in the dark. No significant changes were observed in the postflight responses. The observed changes, when present, may be due to a reinterpretation of inertial cues that are functionally adaptive for the microgravity environment but are not optimal for responses on Earth.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Merfeld, S. Park, C. Gianna-Poulin, F. O. Black, and S. Wood
Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. I. Frequency Response of VOR and Perceptual Responses During Translation and Tilt
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 186 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online