Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 80, Issue 5 1589-1594, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Acoustic rhinometry: influence of paranasal sinuses

O. Hilberg and O. F. Pedersen
Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.

The influence of the maxillary sinuses in acoustic rhinometry (AR) has not been evaluated, and this is the aim of the present study. We examined six subjects with AR and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after nasal decongestion to compare the area-distance relationships determined by the two methods. From the MRI data we obtained copies of the nasal cavities with and without maxillary sinuses, which were made in plastic by a stereolithographic method. AR curves from models without maxillary sinuses differed from AR curves with sinuses included but were in agreement with MRI curves without inclusion of sinuses. A similar difference in AR was seen in two subjects before and after the nasal cavities were flushed with saline to fill up the maxillary sinuses. The measured volume in the first 50 mm of the nasal cavity models was unaffected by the sinuses, but the volume in the first 70 mm corresponding to the length of the nasal cavity septum was increased slightly but significantly (from 10.8 to 11.3 cm3; P = 0.05). The presence of maxillary sinuses increased the volume of the epipharynx (70-100 mm from the nostril) from 12.2 to 21.3 cm3 (P < 0.01), and this increase was not due to the influence from the contralateral nasal cavity. We conclude that the maxillary sinuses may significantly contribute to the acoustically determined areas in the posterior part of the nasal cavity and the epipharynx, especially during decongestion, and may explain a part of the difference between area-distance curves obtained by AR and MRI, whereas contribution from the contralateral nasal cavity does not.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. C. Brinckmann, F. P. Scapin, L. A. G. Bernd, and J. F. L. Neto Effect of Improved Nasal Airflow After Adenoidectomy on Nasal Erectile Tissue Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, August 1, 2008; 134(8): 832 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-F. Papon, L. Brugel-Ribere, R. Fodil, C. Croce, C. Larger, M. Rugina, A. Coste, D. Isabey, F. Zerah-Lancner, and B. Louis Nasal wall compliance in vasomotor rhinitis J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 107 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Tarhan, M. Coskun, O. Cakmak, H. Celik, and M. Cankurtaran Acoustic rhinometry in humans: accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and ostium size J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2005; 99(2): 616 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Fodil, L. Brugel-Ribere, C. Croce, G. Sbirlea-Apiou, C. Larger, J.-F. Papon, C. Delclaux, A. Coste, D. Isabey, and B. Louis Inspiratory flow in the nose: a model coupling flow and vasoerectile tissue distensibility J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 288 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Cakmak, H. Celik, M. Cankurtaran, F. Buyuklu, N. Ozgirgin, and L. N. Ozluoglu Effects of paranasal sinus ostia and volume on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2003; 94(4): 1527 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Brugel-Ribere, R. Fodil, A. Coste, C. Larger, D. Isabey, A. Harf, and B. Louis Segmental analysis of nasal cavity compliance by acoustic rhinometry J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2002; 93(1): 304 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Louis, R. Fodil, S. Jaber, J. Pigeot, P.-H. Jarreau, F. Lofaso, and D. Isabey Dual assessment of airway area profile and respiratory input impedance from a single transient wave J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2001; 90(2): 630 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Terheyden, S. Maune, J. Mertens, and O. Hilberg Acoustic rhinometry: validation by three-dimensionally reconstructed computer tomographic scans J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1013 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Huang, N. Itai, T. Hoshiba, T. Fukunaga, K. Yamanouchi, H. Toga, K. Takahashi, and N. Ohya A new nasal acoustic reflection technique to estimate pharyngeal cross-sectional area during sleep J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2000; 88(4): 1457 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Hilberg, B. Lyholm, A. Michelsen, O. F. Pedersen, and O. Jacobsen Acoustic reflections during rhinometry: spatial resolution and sound loss J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1998; 84(3): 1030 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]