Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Corrigendum for Starr, J Appl Physiol 8 (3) 315-329.
J Appl Physiol 8: 685-s, 1956;
8750-7587/56 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starr, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Starr, I.

Studies Made by Simulating Systole at Necropsy. VI. Estimation of Cardiac Stroke Volume From the Ballistocardiogram

Isaac Starr 1

1 From the Department of Therapeutic Research, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Several mathematical errors have been detected by the author in this paper.

In the short section concerned with the estimation of aortic size from Bazett's compilation of Suter's data, several errors have been discovered, all of them the consequence of a mistake in transcribing measurements made on the aortas at necropsy from the original record. On page 321, line 24 of the right column, the value for the measured aortic cross section area of M.M. should be 3.3 cm2 and that for H.Z. should be 5.1 cm2. The inclusions of these errors in the computation affected the last two correlation coefficients of table I, which should be 0.37 and 0.49; and also regression equations 7 and 8 of table 2 (page 323) which should be:

(See PDF)

(See PDF)

Page 326: In table 4, equations 11 and 12, decimal points have been misplaced. The equations should read:

(See PDF)

(See PDF)

Page 327: In table 5, equation 16, a minus sign before the first term on the right has been omitted, This equation should read:

(See PDF)

The correction of these errors has had no adverse effect on any conclusion given in the paper.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online