Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 79: 2094-2100, 1995;
8750-7587/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasetti, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vicaut, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rasetti, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vicaut, E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 79, Issue 6 2094-2100, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Short exposure to endotoxin increases the constriction induced by angiotensin II in rat aorta

C. Rasetti and E. Vicaut
Laboratoire d'Etude de la Microcirculation, Hopital Fernand Widal, Paris, France.

The contraction elicited by angiotensin II (ANG II) was studied by using standard isometric tension techniques in aortic rings exposed for 1 h to 1 or 10 micrograms/ml Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (LPS). This contraction was 18 and 71% greater for the two doses of LPS, respectively, than in unexposed control rings. In endothelium-denuded rings, the LPS-induced increase in contraction in response to ANG II was completely abolished. Because the contraction induced by ANG II is modulated by the simultaneous release of prostaglandins, we tested the hypothesis that LPS interferes with this modulation. We found that the LPS-induced increase in contraction to ANG II was inhibited in the presence of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (10(-5) M) or the prostaglandin H2/thromboxane A2-receptor antagonist SQ-29548 (2 x 10(-7) M). Conversely, the LPS-induced increase in contraction in response to ANG II was not inhibited by the presence of dexamethasone (10(-6) M), which inhibits new protein synthesis. In addition, there was no loss of vasodilator response to the endothelium-dependent receptor agonist acetylcholine (10(-8)-10(-4) M) or in the constrictor responses to norepinephrine (10(-9)-10(-5) M) and KCl (20-100 mM). We conclude that short exposure to LPS produces a specific increase in the constrictor response to ANG II via mechanisms mediated by prostaglandin H2/thromboxane A2. This effect could be a LPS-induced shift in favor of constrictor prostanoids in the balance of dilator/constrictor prostanoids, the release of which is associated with stimulation by ANG II.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online