Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 79: 1698-1703, 1995;
8750-7587/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minetti, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minetti, A. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 79, Issue 5 1698-1703, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Optimum gradient of mountain paths

A. E. Minetti
Istituto Technologie Biomediche Avanzate, Reparto Fisiologia del Lavoro Muscolare, Consiglio Nazionale della Ricerca, Milan, Italy.

By combining the experiment results of R. Margaria (Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Memorie 7: 299-368, 1938), regarding the metabolic cost of gradient locomotion, together with recent insights on gait biomechanics, a prediction about the most economical gradient of mountain paths (approximately 25%) is obtained and interpreted. The pendulum-like mechanism of walking produces a waste of mechanical work against gravity within the gradient range of up to 15% (the overall efficiency is dominated by the low transmission efficiency), whereas for steeper values only the muscular efficiency is responsible for the (slight) metabolic change (per meter of vertical displacement) with respect to gradient. The speeds at the optimum gradient turned out to be approximately 0.65 m/s (+0.16 m/s vertical) and 1.50 m/s (-0.36 m/s vertical), for uphill and downhill walking, respectively, and the ascensional energy expenditure was 0.4 and 2.0 ml O2.kg body mass-1.vertical m-1 climbed or descended. When the metabolic power becomes a burden, as in high-altitude mountaineering, the optimum gradient should be reduced. A sample of real mountain path gradients, experimentally measured, mimics the obtained predictions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
A. E Minetti, F. Formenti, and L. P Ardigo
Himalayan porter's specialization: metabolic power, economy, efficiency and skill
Proc R Soc B, November 7, 2006; 273(1602): 2791 - 2797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Minetti, C. Moia, G. S. Roi, D. Susta, and G. Ferretti
Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2002; 93(3): 1039 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Minetti, L. ArdigO, E Reinach, and F Saibene
The relationship between mechanical work and energy expenditure of locomotion in horses
J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 1999; 202(17): 2329 - 2338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online