Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 79, Issue 5 1531-1539, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Maximal vasodilation does not eliminate the vascular waterfall in the canine hindlimb

I. Shrier and S. Magder
Herzl Family Practice Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Previous studies have shown that blood flow through skeletal muscle is regulated by changes in an arteriolar vascular waterfall [critical pressure (Pcrit)] and a proximal (arterial) resistance (Ra) element. To determine whether Pcrit still exists during maximal vasodilation, we pump perfused vascularly isolated canine hindlimbs. We set outflow pressure to zero and measured Pcrit, perfusion pressure (Pper), and regional elastic recoil pressure (Pcl; by a stop-flow technique) and calculated both Ra and venous resistance before and after maximal vasodilation with adenosine and nitroprusside. Pcrit was 56.4 +/- 5.1 mmHg before vasodilation and decreased to 11.0 +/- 0.6 mmHg after vasodilation, which was less than the downstream pressure in the venous compliant region (Pel). Therefore, Pcrit should not have affected flow at normal Pper levels under vasodilated conditions. However, we could still measure Pcrit because our technique allowed Pel to decline and Pcrit becomes apparent once Pel < Pcrit. With vasodilation, Ra decreased to < 8.1 +/- 2.6% and Rv decreased to 41 +/- 6% of control values. In contrast to the nonvasodilated vasculature, increases in venous pressure during maximal vasodilation caused immediate increases in Pper. This also suggests that the vascular waterfall is inactive under conditions of maximal vasodilation. We conclude that a small arteriolar Pcrit is still present in the maximally vasodilated hindlimb but is less than the downstream pressure and does not affect flow under these conditions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-J. Wang, J. A. Flewitt, N. G. Shrive, K. H. Parker, and J. V. Tyberg Systemic venous circulation. Waves propagating on a windkessel: relation of arterial and venous windkessels to systemic vascular resistance Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): H154 - H162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Miller Evidence of venous suction, but from where? J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2005; 99(2): 776 - 776. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Egana and S. Green Effect of body tilt on calf muscle performance and blood flow in humans J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2249 - 2258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Schipke, G. Heusch, A. P. Sanii, E. Gams, and J. Winter Static filling pressure in patients during induced ventricular fibrillation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2510 - H2515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Hamann, Z. Valic, J. B. Buckwalter, and P. S. Clifford Muscle pump does not enhance blood flow in exercising skeletal muscle J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2003; 94(1): 6 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Dobson and L. B. Gladden Effect of rhythmic tetanic skeletal muscle contractions on peak muscle perfusion J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2003; 94(1): 11 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Buckwalter and P. S. Clifford Autonomic control of skeletal muscle blood flow at the onset of exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1999; 277(5): H1872 - H1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Buckwalter, S. B. Ruble, P. J. Mueller, and P. S. Clifford Skeletal muscle vasodilation at the onset of exercise J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1998; 85(5): 1649 - 1654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]