Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 79: 518-525, 1995;
8750-7587/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phagoo, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phagoo, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 79, Issue 2 518-525, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of four methods of assessing airflow resistance before and after induced airway narrowing in normal subjects

S. B. Phagoo, R. A. Watson, M. Silverman and N. B. Pride
Department of Paediatrics, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Four methods for assessing airflow resistance were compared in seven normal adults at baseline and after inducing airway narrowing with inhaled methacholine. Airway resistance (Raw) was measured during panting at 1-2 Hz within a body plethysmograph; total lung resistance was measured by using an esophageal balloon during quiet breathing (RLq) and with doubling of frequency while maintaining the original tidal volume; total respiratory resistance (Rrs) was measured at 6 Hz during forced oscillation applied at the airway opening, and interruption resistance (Rint) was measured at midtidal expiratory flow. Three methods of obtaining Rint after airflow interruption were compared [smooth curve fit of mouth pressure (Pm) back extrapolated to valve closure; two-point linear fit of Pm back extrapolated to 15 ms after closure; and Pm at 100 ms after valve closure]. We found similar basal median values (cmH2O.l-1.s) of Raw (1.3), RLq (1.4), RL of double resting frequency (1.9), Rrs (1.7), and smooth curve fit of Pm back extrapolated to valve closure (1.5); basal values of two-point linear fit of Pm back extrapolated to 15 ms after closure (2.4) and Pm at 100 ms after valve closure (4.4) were considerably larger. After induced airway narrowing, all methods of measuring resistance showed significant increases; these were largest with RLq (median %change of 265) and smallest with the three Rint methods (median %change of 62-72). Rint and Rrs methods had poorer sensitivity for detecting bronchoconstriction than lung resistance of Raw. Of the Rint methods, end interruption pressure was the most sensitive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al.
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M. K Johnson, M. Birch, R. Carter, J. Kinsella, and R. D Stevenson
Measurement of physiological recovery from exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using within-breath forced oscillometry
Thorax, April 1, 2007; 62(4): 299 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. K. Johnson, M. Birch, R. Carter, J. Kinsella, and R. D. Stevenson
Use of reactance to estimate transpulmonary resistance
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1061 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P D Sly and E Lombardi
Measurement of lung function in preschool children using the interrupter technique
Thorax, September 1, 2003; 58(9): 742 - 744.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. Beydon, F. Amsallem, M. Bellet, M. Boule, M. Chaussain, A. Denjean, R. Matran, B. Wuyam, C. Alberti, and C. Gaultier
Pre/Postbronchodilator Interrupter Resistance Values in Healthy Young Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2002; 165(10): 1388 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.J. Chavasse, Y. Bastian-Lee, and P. Seddon
Comparison of resistance measured by the interrupter technique and by passive mechanics in sedated infants
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2001; 18(2): 330 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
F. Child, S. Clayton, S. Davies, A.A. Fryer, P.W. Jones, and W. Lenney
How should airways resistance be measured in young children: mask or mouthpiece?
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2001; 17(6): 1244 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. YOUNES, J. KUN, B. MASIOWSKI, K. WEBSTER, and D. ROBERTS
A Method for Noninvasive Determination of Inspiratory Resistance during Proportional Assist Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2001; 163(4): 829 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. L. McLane, J. A. Nelson, K. A. Lenner, R. Hejal, C. Kotaru, M. Skowronski, A. Coreno, E. Lane, and E. R. McFadden Jr.
Integrated response of the upper and lower respiratory tract of asthmatic subjects to frigid air
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2000; 88(3): 1043 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online