Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 78: 914-920, 1995;
8750-7587/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saito, O.
Right arrow Articles by Albert, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saito, O.
Right arrow Articles by Albert, R. K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 78, Issue 3 914-920, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Flow pulsatility does not increase mean microvascular pressure or filtration in zone 3 rabbit lungs

O. Saito, W. J. Lamm, J. Hildebrandt and R. K. Albert
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.

We previously reported that mean pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) during pulsatile flow exceeded that for steady flow when flow was greater than the normal resting value and speculated that this was due to irregularities of the flow profiles in precapillary vessels, mainly the larger arteries. From this we hypothesized that neither mean microvascular pressure nor the rate of fluid filtration would be affected by flow pulsatility. We therefore compared the effects of steady vs. pulsatile flow on the double-occlusion pressure (Pdo) and on edema formation (rate of weight gain) in zone 3 rabbit lungs. Excised left lungs (n = 19) were perfused with Tyrode solution and ventilated with an end-expiratory pressure of 2.5 cmH2O. A diaphragm pump generated pulsatile flow with a stroke volume of 1.0 ml (approximately 0.8 the normal resting value for rabbit left lung). Nonpulsatile flow was generated by raising an arterial reservoir. Flow rate was set at 100 or 400 ml/min (approximately 0.4 or 1.6 x the normal resting cardiac output, respectively). Vascular pressures (referenced to the bottom of the lung) were measured after ventilation, at end expiration, was interrupted. Pdo values were obtained in random order at 15 time points that were evenly distributed within the pulse cycle, averaged across pulses to obtain the mean capillary pressure profile, and then averaged over time. At the lower flow of 100 ml/min, mean Ppa and Pdo were slightly lower (3-4%) during pulsatile compared with nonpulsatile conditions. At the higher flow of 400 ml/min, mean Ppa was higher under pulsatile conditions (13%), whereas downstream the mean Pdo values were equal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online