Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 78: 198-204, 1995;
8750-7587/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weydahl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sothern, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weydahl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sothern, R. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 78, Issue 1 198-204, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Time-dependent glycemic response to exercise in winter and spring in the subarctic

A. Weydahl, P. A. Balto, E. H. Einvik, B. R. Mikkelsen and R. B. Sothern
Division of Arctic Chronobiology, Finnmark College, Alta, Norway.

Twenty healthy athletes exercised for 30 min at four different times (beginning at 1130 and 1630) in December (darkness period) and in April (18 h of daylight). Four hours after intake of a standardized meal, a 30-min bike exercise with an intensity of 60% maximal O2 uptake was performed. Blood samples (fingertip) were drawn at 1, 5, 10, and 30 min into exercise and 5, 10, and 30 min after termination of exercise for determination of blood glucose. Glucose values were normalized by reexpressing each as a percentage of the starting value. The total area under the glucose-time curves as well as the area below the starting value was calculated. Areas were tested for the effect of sex, time of day, and season by analysis of variance. For the group as a whole during exercise, a significant effect was found by analysis of variance for sex, time of exercise, and season. During recovery, significant differences were found for sex and time of exercise but not for season. The minimal integrated glucose response to exercise occurred in females, who also showed the most rapid return to baseline values during the recovery period. Exercise in the morning produced the smallest glucose response for both sexes and faster recovery compared with exercise in the afternoon. This was also the case overall for exercise in December compared with April. This finding implies that the glycemic response may be influenced by season and timing of exercise, which may be of importance for athletes involved in vigorous training and patients with diabetes mellitus.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online