Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 77: 58-62, 1994;
8750-7587/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stauber, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Knack, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stauber, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Knack, K. K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 77, Issue 1 58-62, Copyright © 1994 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Adaptation of rat soleus muscles to 4 wk of intermittent strain

W. T. Stauber, G. R. Miller, J. G. Grimmett and K. K. Knack
Department of Physiology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown 26506-9229.

The effect of repeated strains on rat soleus muscles was investigated by stretching active muscles 3 times/wk for 4 wk with two different methods of stretching. The adaptation of myofibers and noncontractile tissue was followed by histochemical techniques and computer-assisted image analysis. Muscle hypertrophy was seen in the slow-stretched muscles, which increased in mass by 13% and increased in myofiber cross-sectional area by 30%. In the fast-stretched muscle, mass increased by 10% but myofiber cross-sectional area actually decreased. This decrease in mean fiber area was the result of a population of very small fibers (population A) that coexisted with slightly smaller normal-sized fibers (population B). Fibers in population A did not have the distribution expected from atrophy compared with atrophic fibers from unloaded muscles; they were much smaller. In addition, there was a 44% increase in noncontractile tissue in the fast-stretched muscles. Thus, soleus muscles subjected to repeated strains respond differently to slow and fast stretching. Slow stretching results in typical muscle hypertrophy, whereas fast stretching produces somewhat larger muscles but with a mixture of small and normal-sized myofibers accompanied by a marked proliferation of noncontractile tissue.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ptjournalHome page
A. E Barr and M. F Barbe
Pathophysiological Tissue Changes Associated With Repetitive Movement: A Review of the Evidence
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2002; 82(2): 173 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. M. Lapointe, P. Fremont, and C. H. Cote
Adaptation to lengthening contractions is independent of voluntary muscle recruitment but relies on inflammation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): R323 - R329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Hodgson, S. Wichayanuparp, M. R. Recktenwald, R. R. Roy, G. McCall, M. K. Day, D. Washburn, J. W. Fanton, I. Kozlovskaya, and V. R. Edgerton
Circadian Force and EMG Activity in Hindlimb Muscles of Rhesus Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1430 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online