Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 76: 2726-2734, 1994;
8750-7587/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Liew, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Burkard, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Liew, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Burkard, M. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 76, Issue 6 2726-2734, Copyright © 1994 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Probabilistic model of altitude decompression sickness based on mechanistic premises

H. D. Van Liew, J. Conkin and M. E. Burkard
Department of Physiology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York 14214.

To develop a predictive equation and to test ideas about the mechanisms involved in hypobaric decompression sickness, we performed statistical analyses on published results of 7,023 exercising O2-breathing men subjected to one-step decompressions in altitude chambers. The dependent variable was signs or symptoms so severe that the person's trial was terminated (forced descent). The three independent variables were 1) duration of 100% O2 breathing at ground level (prebreathing), 2) atmospheric pressure after ascent, and 3) exposure duration. The best model, chosen from trial-and-error combinations of premises about bubble behavior, indicates that decompression sickness outcome depends on 1) prebreathing time, but with an unexpectedly long washout half time for N2; 2) time at altitude, as if bubbles grow; and 3) the estimated difference, raised to the fifth power, between the partial pressure of N2 in tissue before and that in bubbles after decompression, perhaps an index of the number of bubbles generated. We expect the model to provide accurate predictions for decompressions matching those of the bulk of the data; the mechanistic cues should be considered hypotheses for further investigation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. P. Foster, A. H. Feiveson, and A. M. Boriek
Predicting time to decompression illness during exercise at altitude, based on formation and growth of bubbles
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): R2317 - R2328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. P. Foster, J. Conkin, M. R. Powell, J. M. Waligora, and R. S. Chhikara
Role of metabolic gases in bubble formation during hypobaric exposures
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1998; 84(3): 1088 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online