Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 76: 1968-1975, 1994;
8750-7587/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gozal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Keens, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gozal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Keens, T. G.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 76, Issue 5 1968-1975, Copyright © 1994 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Maturational differences in step vs. ramp hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory responses

D. Gozal, R. Arens, K. J. Omlin, C. L. Marcus and T. G. Keens
Division of Neonatology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California School of Medicine 90027.

The influence of the speed of stimulus presentation on hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory responses (step vs. ramp) is not known. Furthermore, it is unclear whether children and adults respond similarly. We tested ramp ventilatory responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia with use of rebreathing in 8 prepubertal children and 11 adults. We tested step ventilatory responses to hypercapnia with single vital capacity breaths of 15% CO2 in O2 and to hypoxia with five tidal breaths of 100% N2. For children, slopes of step hypercapnic ventilatory responses were always greater than those of ramp responses (0.85 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.07 l.min-1.Torr end-tidal PCO2-1; P < 0.0005). Conversely, for adults, step responses were always less than ramp responses (0.88 +/- 0.19 vs. 2.10 +/- 0.29 l.min-1.Torr end-tidal PCO2-1; P < 0.0007). Similarly, for children, the slopes of step hypoxic ventilatory responses were always greater than those of ramp responses (-0.71 +/- 0.09 vs. -0.45 +/- 0.04 l.min-1.Torr O2 saturation-1; P < 0.02), and for adults, step responses were always less than ramp responses (-0.68 +/- 0.14 vs. -1.85 +/- 0.46 l.min-1.Torr O2 saturation-1; P < 0.04). We conclude that ventilatory responses vary depending on step vs. ramp presentation of hypercapnia or hypoxia and that the ratio of these responses is reversed in children compared with adults. We speculate that the responsiveness of peripheral chemoreceptors is increased in children compared with adults and that it may play a role in the mechanisms leading to increased ventilatory responses observed during childhood.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Huang, I. M. Colrain, H. B. Panitch, I. E. Tapia, M. S. Schwartz, J. Samuel, M. Pepe, P. Bandla, R. Bradford, Y. P. Mosse, et al.
Effect of sleep stage on breathing in children with central hypoventilation
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 44 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. L. Marcus, L. B. Fernandes Do Prado, J. Lutz, E. S. Katz, C. A. Black, P. Galster, and K. A. Carson
Developmental changes in upper airway dynamics
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2004; 97(1): 98 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. ARENS, J. M. MCDONOUGH, A. M. CORBIN, M. E. HERNANDEZ, G. MAISLIN, R. J. SCHWAB, and A. I. PACK
Linear Dimensions of the Upper Airway Structure during Development . Assessment by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2002; 165(1): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. L. MARCUS
Sleep-disordered Breathing in Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2001; 164(1): 16 - 30.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. Katayama, Y. Sato, Y. Morotome, N. Shima, K. Ishida, S. Mori, and M. Miyamura
Intermittent hypoxia increases ventilation and SaO2 during hypoxic exercise and hypoxic chemosensitivity
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2001; 90(4): 1431 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. L. Marcus, J. Lutz, A. Hamer, P. L. Smith, and A. Schwartz
Developmental changes in response to subatmospheric pressure loading of the upper airway
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 1999; 87(2): 626 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
D. S. Pine, J. D. Coplan, L. A. Papp, R. G. Klein, J. M. Martinez, P. Kovalenko, N. Tancer, D. Moreau, E. S. Dummit III, D. Shaffer, et al.
Ventilatory Physiology of Children and Adolescents With Anxiety Disorders
Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 1998; 55(2): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online