Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 76: 1378-1383, 1994;
8750-7587/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slordahl, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slordahl, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, N. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 76, Issue 3 1378-1383, Copyright © 1994 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Regurgitant volume in aortic regurgitation from a parameter estimation procedure

S. A. Slordahl, H. F. Kuecherer, J. E. Solbakken, H. Piene, B. A. Angelsen and N. B. Schiller
Adult Echocardiography Laboratory/Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0214.

The regurgitant volume and regurgitant orifice area as well as total peripheral resistance and arterial compliance were estimated in a cardiovascular hydromechanical simulator and in 10 patients with aortic regurgitation. A parameter estimation procedure based on a simple model of the cardiovascular system, Doppler measurements of the regurgitant jet, aortic systolic flow, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures was used. In the cardiovascular simulator the estimated regurgitant orifice area was compared with the size of a hole in the disk of a mechanical aortic valve. In the patients the regurgitant fraction was compared with semiquantitative grading from echocardiography routinely performed in our laboratory. In the hydromechanical simulator, the estimated regurgitant orifice area of 26.5 +/- 3.5 (SD) mm2 (n = 9) was not different from the true value of 24 mm2. In the patients there was a fair relationship between the estimated regurgitant fraction and the semiquantitative grading. The estimated regurgitant orifice areas varied between 1.6 and 31.2 mm2. The estimated mean values of total peripheral resistance and arterial compliance were 1.67 +/- 0.55 mmHg.s.ml-1 and 1.30 +/- 0.42 ml/mmHg, respectively.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online