Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 75: 2022-2027, 1993;
8750-7587/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courteix, D.
Right arrow Articles by Coudert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Courteix, D.
Right arrow Articles by Coudert, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 75, Issue 5 2022-2027, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Chemical and nonchemical stimuli during breath holding in divers are not independent

D. Courteix, M. Bedu, N. Fellmann, M. C. Heraud and J. Coudert
Laboratoire de Physiologie, Faculte de Medecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

In the breath-hold model described by S. Godfrey and E. J. M. Campbell (Respir. Physiol. 5: 385-400, 1968), chemical and nonchemical stimuli are independent. Because these two factors are time dependent, the effect of each could not be measured by breath-holding time (BHT). The aim of this study is to dissociate chemical and nonchemical stimuli and to assess the effects of BHT and PCO2 on respiratory center output by measurement of occlusion pressure (P0.1) and mean inspiratory flow (VI). Nine well-trained divers (age 36.5 +/- 5.0 yr) took part in the study. Each subject had to hold his breath at 75% of vital capacity for 30, 50, and 70 s of BHT. Before each breath hold, the subject inspired successively two vital capacities of the same CO2-O2 gas mixture. P0.1 and VI were measured during the first reinspiration after the breath hold. For the same BHT, we observed good linear relationships between P0.1 or VI and alveolar PCO2. The slopes of these relationships increased with BHT. For alveolar PCO2 of > 50 Torr, P0.1 increased linearly with BHT. These results indicate that, during breath holding, chemical and nonchemical stimuli acted linearly on respiratory motoneuron activity, but they were not independent.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online