Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 75: 1946-1954, 1993;
8750-7587/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCoy, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCoy, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, G. J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 75, Issue 5 1946-1954, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Swim training alters renal and cardiovascular responses to stress in borderline hypertensive rats

D. E. McCoy, J. E. Steele, R. H. Cox, R. L. Wiley and G. J. McGuire
Department of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056.

The present study assessed the effects of 40 min of tail shock stress (1-s shock, 0.2 mA every 30 s) on renal and cardiovascular function in swim-trained (T), water-immersed (IM), and untrained (UT) borderline hypertensive rats (BHR). T BHR swam for 2 h/day 5 days/wk for 10-12 wk, whereas IM BHR on the same schedule were placed in water at neck level and were not permitted to swim. Age-matched sedentary controls were paired one each with the exercise group (group 1) and the immersion group (group 2). Heart rate was significantly greater in UT than in T BHR (P = 0.09) during baseline (rest). Heart rate responses during stress were not different between UT and IM BHR (group 2). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures during stress and recovery were not different between UT BHR and T or IM BHR. Urine flow rate was significantly increased from baseline during the first 20 min of stress in UT and IM BHR only. Changes in glomerular filtration rate were not consistent across studies. Renal blood flow decreased significantly from baseline during tail shock stress in UT but not T BHR. Plasma glucose levels were significantly increased above baseline during the second 20 min of stress in UT BHR only and were significantly greater than those in the T BHR. Plasma insulin levels in UT BHR were significantly decreased from baseline during tail shock stress and recovery but were unchanged from baseline in T BHR. These observations suggest that swim training independent of water immersion alters the effect that stress exerts on renal and cardiovascular function in BHR, which results in better fluid and electrolyte conservation in T BHR.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online